From a network model to a model network: strategies for network development to narrow the LIS research-practice gap

Hazel Hall, Bruce Martin Ryan, Rachel Salzano, Katherine Stephen
{"title":"From a network model to a model network: strategies for network development to narrow the LIS research-practice gap","authors":"Hazel Hall, Bruce Martin Ryan, Rachel Salzano, Katherine Stephen","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2022-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the empirical study was to examine whether strategies shown to work well in one model of network development for library and information science (LIS) practitioners and researchers could be applied successfully in the development of a new network and contribute to the narrowing of the research–practice gap in LIS.Design/methodology/approachOverall, 32 members of a new professional network were surveyed by a questionnaire following the completion of a programme of four network events held between 2019 and 2021.FindingsThe analysis demonstrates the transferability of the existing model of network development to a new network and that it can be successfully adapted for online delivery of network events and activities.Practical implicationsThe criteria deployed for the evaluation of the new network could be used in other similar settings. Funding bodies can also use these findings as demonstration of the value of their investment in network grants.Originality/valueThis contribution on means of growing collaborative networks to narrow the LIS research–practice gap stands out in contrast with prior research that tends to focus the support of research productivity of academic librarians in North American universities for the purposes of career development. Here wider aspects of research engagement are considered of value for LIS practitioners from a range of sectors and institutions, beyond North America, for purposes that are broader than personal advancement.","PeriodicalId":402385,"journal":{"name":"J. Documentation","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-04-2022-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the empirical study was to examine whether strategies shown to work well in one model of network development for library and information science (LIS) practitioners and researchers could be applied successfully in the development of a new network and contribute to the narrowing of the research–practice gap in LIS.Design/methodology/approachOverall, 32 members of a new professional network were surveyed by a questionnaire following the completion of a programme of four network events held between 2019 and 2021.FindingsThe analysis demonstrates the transferability of the existing model of network development to a new network and that it can be successfully adapted for online delivery of network events and activities.Practical implicationsThe criteria deployed for the evaluation of the new network could be used in other similar settings. Funding bodies can also use these findings as demonstration of the value of their investment in network grants.Originality/valueThis contribution on means of growing collaborative networks to narrow the LIS research–practice gap stands out in contrast with prior research that tends to focus the support of research productivity of academic librarians in North American universities for the purposes of career development. Here wider aspects of research engagement are considered of value for LIS practitioners from a range of sectors and institutions, beyond North America, for purposes that are broader than personal advancement.
从网络模型到网络模型:缩小LIS研究与实践差距的网络发展策略
目的:本实证研究的目的是检验在图书馆情报学(LIS)从业者和研究人员网络发展模型中行之有效的策略是否可以成功地应用于新网络的开发,并有助于缩小图书馆情报学(LIS)研究与实践的差距。设计/方法/方法总体而言,在2019年至2021年期间举行的四次网络活动计划完成后,新专业网络的32名成员接受了问卷调查。分析表明,现有的网络发展模式可转移到一个新的网络,它可以成功地适应网络事件和活动的在线交付。实际意义用于评估新网络的标准可用于其他类似环境。资助机构也可以利用这些发现来证明它们对网络赠款的投资价值。原创性/价值与先前的研究相比,该研究对通过不断增长的合作网络来缩小美国研究与实践差距的方法做出了贡献,这些研究往往侧重于支持北美大学学术图书馆员的研究生产力,以实现职业发展的目的。在这里,研究参与的更广泛方面被认为对来自北美以外的一系列部门和机构的LIS从业者具有价值,其目的比个人进步更广泛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信