{"title":"Late Roman Iconography and Style","authors":"S. McFadden","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190850326.013.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussions of late Roman style and iconography sometimes tend to emphasize the liminality of visual culture in late antiquity; monuments representative of the period such as the Arch of Constantine are neither fully “classical” nor “medieval” in their form and content; hence, the instinct to compare its style and iconography with that of the past or future monuments is hard to resist. The result of this lure to dichotomize is often a focus on what a late Roman work of art is not, rather than what it is (i.e., how an artwork or monument functions in its contemporary moment). This chapter therefore presents the wall paintings from the late third- to early fourth-century domus underneath the Church of Ss. Giovanni e Paolo on the Caelian Hill in Rome as a case study of a particular moment in late Roman visuality so as to better understand how engagements with iconography and style in the context of the late Roman home activate “modern” meanings and experiences.","PeriodicalId":438100,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Roman Imagery and Iconography","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Roman Imagery and Iconography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190850326.013.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Discussions of late Roman style and iconography sometimes tend to emphasize the liminality of visual culture in late antiquity; monuments representative of the period such as the Arch of Constantine are neither fully “classical” nor “medieval” in their form and content; hence, the instinct to compare its style and iconography with that of the past or future monuments is hard to resist. The result of this lure to dichotomize is often a focus on what a late Roman work of art is not, rather than what it is (i.e., how an artwork or monument functions in its contemporary moment). This chapter therefore presents the wall paintings from the late third- to early fourth-century domus underneath the Church of Ss. Giovanni e Paolo on the Caelian Hill in Rome as a case study of a particular moment in late Roman visuality so as to better understand how engagements with iconography and style in the context of the late Roman home activate “modern” meanings and experiences.
对晚期罗马风格和肖像学的讨论有时倾向于强调古代晚期视觉文化的局限性;像君士坦丁拱门这样的标志性建筑在形式上和内容上都不完全是“古典”或“中世纪”的;因此,将其风格和图像与过去或未来的纪念碑进行比较的本能是难以抗拒的。这种两分法的诱惑导致的结果往往是,人们关注的是一件晚期罗马艺术作品不是什么,而不是它是什么(也就是说,一件艺术品或纪念碑在当代是如何发挥作用的)。因此,本章展示了罗马Caelian Hill上st . Giovanni e Paolo教堂下的三世纪晚期到四世纪早期的壁画,作为罗马晚期视觉性的一个特定时刻的案例研究,以便更好地理解在罗马晚期家庭背景下与图像学和风格的接触如何激活“现代”意义和体验。