Climate change disclosure and sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the 2030 agenda: the moderating role of corporate governance

Mohamed Toukabri, Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Youssef
{"title":"Climate change disclosure and sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the 2030 agenda: the moderating role of corporate governance","authors":"Mohamed Toukabri, Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Youssef","doi":"10.1108/jices-02-2022-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study is justified by the economic importance of information on greenhouse gases, as well as the interest in the question of governance structure after the adoption of the objectives of the 2030 Agenda. The problem is also explained by the lack of research that has investigated the relationship between the best governance structure that contributes to achieving sustainability goals, including climate actions (SDG13) and clean energy adoption (SDG7) as part of the 2030 Agenda.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe level of disclosure is measured on the basis of the carbon disclosure score calculated by the carbon disclosure project (CDP). The study sample consists of 387 US companies that voluntarily participated in the CDP survey from 2011 to 2018. The authors use panel data analysis based on multiple regression models.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results confirm the influential role of board size, director independence, the presence of women on the board and the presence of an environmental committee on carbon disclosure. In terms of carbon disclosure, the results suggest that a better governance structure is likely to reduce carbon emissions and improve carbon performance practices. Similarly, the analyses show a different representation of the role of corporate governance in high-carbon sectors compared to low-carbon sectors.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study has some limitations. First, the sample is only interested in US companies that responded to the CDP questionnaire during the period 2011–2018. Thus, the results cannot be generalized to countries with different governance structures. Second, the data from this study on carbon disclosure, specifically focuses on CDP reporting to determine the carbon disclosure score. In this sense, the findings on information disclosed do not necessarily address disclosures through other media, such as a company’s website or a press release.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nSustainability and commitment to the sustainable development goals (SDGs) are more likely to exist in companies that have good governance and, in particular, a better board. The research is inspired by the SDGs. The study aims to examine the relationship between carbon disclosure and corporate governance in the context of SDGs. Indeed, this research work contributes to achieving sustainability goals, including climate actions (SDG13) and clean energy adoption (SDG7).\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-02-2022-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose This study is justified by the economic importance of information on greenhouse gases, as well as the interest in the question of governance structure after the adoption of the objectives of the 2030 Agenda. The problem is also explained by the lack of research that has investigated the relationship between the best governance structure that contributes to achieving sustainability goals, including climate actions (SDG13) and clean energy adoption (SDG7) as part of the 2030 Agenda. Design/methodology/approach The level of disclosure is measured on the basis of the carbon disclosure score calculated by the carbon disclosure project (CDP). The study sample consists of 387 US companies that voluntarily participated in the CDP survey from 2011 to 2018. The authors use panel data analysis based on multiple regression models. Findings The results confirm the influential role of board size, director independence, the presence of women on the board and the presence of an environmental committee on carbon disclosure. In terms of carbon disclosure, the results suggest that a better governance structure is likely to reduce carbon emissions and improve carbon performance practices. Similarly, the analyses show a different representation of the role of corporate governance in high-carbon sectors compared to low-carbon sectors. Research limitations/implications This study has some limitations. First, the sample is only interested in US companies that responded to the CDP questionnaire during the period 2011–2018. Thus, the results cannot be generalized to countries with different governance structures. Second, the data from this study on carbon disclosure, specifically focuses on CDP reporting to determine the carbon disclosure score. In this sense, the findings on information disclosed do not necessarily address disclosures through other media, such as a company’s website or a press release. Originality/value Sustainability and commitment to the sustainable development goals (SDGs) are more likely to exist in companies that have good governance and, in particular, a better board. The research is inspired by the SDGs. The study aims to examine the relationship between carbon disclosure and corporate governance in the context of SDGs. Indeed, this research work contributes to achieving sustainability goals, including climate actions (SDG13) and clean energy adoption (SDG7).
气候变化信息披露与2030年可持续发展目标:公司治理的调节作用
考虑到温室气体信息在经济上的重要性,以及对2030年议程目标通过后治理结构问题的兴趣,本研究是合理的。缺乏对有助于实现可持续发展目标的最佳治理结构之间关系的研究也解释了这一问题,这些目标包括气候行动(SDG13)和作为2030年议程一部分的清洁能源采用(SDG7)。设计/方法/方法披露水平是根据碳披露项目(CDP)计算的碳披露得分来衡量的。研究样本包括2011年至2018年自愿参与CDP调查的387家美国公司。采用基于多元回归模型的面板数据分析。研究结果证实了董事会规模、董事独立性、董事会中女性的存在以及碳信息披露环境委员会的存在等因素的影响作用。在碳信息披露方面,研究结果表明,一个更好的治理结构可能会减少碳排放,改善碳绩效实践。同样,分析表明,与低碳行业相比,公司治理在高碳行业中的作用表现不同。研究的局限性/意义本研究有一些局限性。首先,样本只对2011-2018年期间回答了gdp问卷的美国公司感兴趣。因此,研究结果不能推广到治理结构不同的国家。其次,本研究的碳披露数据,特别关注CDP报告,以确定碳披露得分。从这个意义上说,对披露信息的调查结果不一定涉及通过其他媒体(如公司网站或新闻稿)披露的信息。具有良好治理的公司,尤其是拥有更好董事会的公司,更有可能实现可持续性和对可持续发展目标(sdg)的承诺。这项研究受到可持续发展目标的启发。本研究旨在考察可持续发展目标背景下碳信息披露与公司治理之间的关系。事实上,这项研究工作有助于实现可持续发展目标,包括气候行动(SDG13)和清洁能源采用(SDG7)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信