Technology Enhanced Learning: The Role of Ontologies for Feedback in Music Performance

M. Yee-King, Thomas Wilmering, M. T. Rodriguez, Maria Krivenski, M. d'Inverno
{"title":"Technology Enhanced Learning: The Role of Ontologies for Feedback in Music Performance","authors":"M. Yee-King, Thomas Wilmering, M. T. Rodriguez, Maria Krivenski, M. d'Inverno","doi":"10.3389/fdigh.2018.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present an analysis of feedback as it occurs in classroom-based and technology supported music instrument learning. Feedback is key to learning in music education, and we have developed technology based on ideas from social media and audio annotation which aims to make feedback more effective. The analysis here aims to enhance our understanding of technology-mediated feedback. The result of this analysis is three ontologies describing feedback and feedback systems. First, we developed the \\emph{teacher's ontology} using a qualitative, observational approach to describe the types of feedback that music instrument tutors give to their students. We used this ontology to inform the design of an online music annotation platform for music students. Second, we developed the \\emph{grounded ontology} using a grounded theory approach, based on 2,000 annotations made by students and tutors using the annotation platform. We compare the grounded and teacher's ontologies by examining structural, semantic and expressive features. Through this comparison, we find that the grounded ontology includes elements of the teacher's ontology as well as elements relating to practical and social aspects of the annotation platform, while the teacher's ontology contains more domain knowledge. The third ontology is a formalisation of the transactional capabilities of the platform, and we refer to it as the \\emph{platform ontology}. We present it using the OWL language, and we show how this allows us to develop several practical use cases, including the use of semantic web capabilities in music education contexts.","PeriodicalId":227954,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers Digit. Humanit.","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers Digit. Humanit.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2018.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper, we present an analysis of feedback as it occurs in classroom-based and technology supported music instrument learning. Feedback is key to learning in music education, and we have developed technology based on ideas from social media and audio annotation which aims to make feedback more effective. The analysis here aims to enhance our understanding of technology-mediated feedback. The result of this analysis is three ontologies describing feedback and feedback systems. First, we developed the \emph{teacher's ontology} using a qualitative, observational approach to describe the types of feedback that music instrument tutors give to their students. We used this ontology to inform the design of an online music annotation platform for music students. Second, we developed the \emph{grounded ontology} using a grounded theory approach, based on 2,000 annotations made by students and tutors using the annotation platform. We compare the grounded and teacher's ontologies by examining structural, semantic and expressive features. Through this comparison, we find that the grounded ontology includes elements of the teacher's ontology as well as elements relating to practical and social aspects of the annotation platform, while the teacher's ontology contains more domain knowledge. The third ontology is a formalisation of the transactional capabilities of the platform, and we refer to it as the \emph{platform ontology}. We present it using the OWL language, and we show how this allows us to develop several practical use cases, including the use of semantic web capabilities in music education contexts.
技术增强学习:音乐表演中反馈本体的作用
在本文中,我们提出了反馈的分析,因为它发生在基于课堂和技术支持的乐器学习。在音乐教育中,反馈是学习的关键,我们基于社交媒体和音频注释的想法开发了技术,旨在使反馈更有效。本文的分析旨在增强我们对技术介导的反馈的理解。分析的结果是描述反馈和反馈系统的三个本体。首先,我们发展了\emph{教师本体},使用定性的、观察的方法来描述乐器导师给学生的反馈类型。我们利用这个本体为音乐专业学生设计了一个在线音乐标注平台。其次,我们基于学生和导师使用注释平台所做的2000个注释,使用扎根理论方法开发了扎根\emph{本体}。我们通过考察结构、语义和表达特征来比较学生和教师的本体。通过比较,我们发现接地本体包含了教师本体的元素,也包含了标注平台的实践和社会方面的元素,而教师本体包含了更多的领域知识。第三个本体是平台事务功能的形式化,我们将其称为\emph{平台本体}。我们使用OWL语言来展示它,并展示了它如何允许我们开发几个实际用例,包括在音乐教育环境中使用语义网功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信