Novel Test Methods for NPSF Faults in SRAM

M. Parvathi, T. Himasree, T. Bhavyasree
{"title":"Novel Test Methods for NPSF Faults in SRAM","authors":"M. Parvathi, T. Himasree, T. Bhavyasree","doi":"10.1109/CCTES.2018.8674087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NPSF (Neighborhood Pattern Sensitive Faults) involves with three or more cells in the memory. These NPSF fault models are recognized as high quality fault models for memory arrays. The excessive test algorithm time lost associated with its compared to other fault models restricts its adoption for memory testing. The existing methodology for NPSF fault detection using CA (Cellular Automata) with Hamiltonian sequence is inadequate due to long test time and deficient in complete fault detection. In order to improve the fault detection further, an extensive test method is proposed in our work that uses binary and gray sequences along with existing Hamiltonian series in the CA test environment. Since CA uses set of rules, 256 such rules are considered in the combination of 28 i.e., 00000000 to 11111111. These rules are applied in parallel while writing each Hamiltonian or gray or binary bit pattern on the chosen memory structure. It is observed that the speed of fault detection is improved by 29% and 44% using Gray and binary series respectively at the cost of area overhead in terms of number of slice LUT’s which are raised by 15% when compared with existing Hamiltonian series. The key advantage of using Gray and binary is that the fault free test pattern arises at rule 60 and 204 respectively. Whereas using Hamiltonian, it is required to wait until rule 225 to arise fault free condition.","PeriodicalId":219876,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering & Sciences (CCTES)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering & Sciences (CCTES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCTES.2018.8674087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

NPSF (Neighborhood Pattern Sensitive Faults) involves with three or more cells in the memory. These NPSF fault models are recognized as high quality fault models for memory arrays. The excessive test algorithm time lost associated with its compared to other fault models restricts its adoption for memory testing. The existing methodology for NPSF fault detection using CA (Cellular Automata) with Hamiltonian sequence is inadequate due to long test time and deficient in complete fault detection. In order to improve the fault detection further, an extensive test method is proposed in our work that uses binary and gray sequences along with existing Hamiltonian series in the CA test environment. Since CA uses set of rules, 256 such rules are considered in the combination of 28 i.e., 00000000 to 11111111. These rules are applied in parallel while writing each Hamiltonian or gray or binary bit pattern on the chosen memory structure. It is observed that the speed of fault detection is improved by 29% and 44% using Gray and binary series respectively at the cost of area overhead in terms of number of slice LUT’s which are raised by 15% when compared with existing Hamiltonian series. The key advantage of using Gray and binary is that the fault free test pattern arises at rule 60 and 204 respectively. Whereas using Hamiltonian, it is required to wait until rule 225 to arise fault free condition.
SRAM中NPSF故障的新测试方法
NPSF(邻域模式敏感故障)涉及到记忆中的三个或更多的细胞。这些NPSF故障模型被认为是存储器阵列的高质量故障模型。与其他故障模型相比,其测试算法时间损失过大,限制了其在内存测试中的应用。现有的基于hamilton序列元胞自动机的NPSF故障检测方法由于测试时间长,且缺乏完整的故障检测能力,存在一定的不足。为了进一步提高故障检测能力,本文提出了一种在CA测试环境下,将二值序列和灰度序列结合已有的哈密顿级数进行扩展测试的方法。由于CA使用一组规则,因此256条这样的规则被认为是28的组合,即00000000到11111111。当在所选的存储器结构上写入每个哈密顿或灰度或二进制位模式时,并行地应用这些规则。结果表明,采用灰度序列和二值序列的故障检测速度分别提高了29%和44%,但代价是面积开销,切片LUT的数量比现有哈密顿序列提高了15%。使用灰色和二进制的主要优点是无故障测试模式分别出现在规则60和204。而使用哈密顿量,则需要等到规则225才出现无故障条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信