Femoral Neck Anteversion Measured Using a 3D CT Scan Perpendicular to the Mechanical Axis of the Femur

K. Kim, J. Roh, Sang Bum Kim, W. Lee, Y. Won, Dong-Sik Chae
{"title":"Femoral Neck Anteversion Measured Using a 3D CT Scan Perpendicular to the Mechanical Axis of the Femur","authors":"K. Kim, J. Roh, Sang Bum Kim, W. Lee, Y. Won, Dong-Sik Chae","doi":"10.5371/JKHS.2011.23.1.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We wanted to measure the femoral neck anteversion (FNA) angles using a 3D CT scan that perpendicularly cut the mechanical axis of the femur and to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of different measuring methods. Materials and Methods: We obtained 95 cases of 3D CT images of the cross-section perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. The methods used to measure the FNA angles included a method using the CT image of the area where the femoral neck is confluent to the greater trochanter (method 1), a method using the CT image taken from the neck base immediately prior to the beginning of the area of the lesser trochanter (method 2) and a method by which measurements are made after putting 3D bone models on a horizontal plane in virtual space (method 3). The reference axes of the distal femur we used were the anatomical transepicondylar axis, the surgical transepicondylar axis and the real posterior condylar axis. Results: The FNA angles measured by method 1 were 4.79±6.41。to the anatomical transepicondylar axis (ATEA), 6.09±6.58。to the surgical transepicondylar axis (STEA) and 7.96±6.81。to the real posterior condylar axis (rPCA). The FNA angles measured by method 2 were 16.01±8.31。to the ATEA, 19.52±8.38。to the STEA and 21.79± 8.52。to the rPCA. The FNA angles measured by method 3 were 20.15±12.89。to the rPCA. Conclusion: The measurement of the FNA angle using a 3D CT scan perpendicular to the mechanical axis is reproducible. The measurement method on the neck base level is more reliable than the one on the proximal neck confluence, and more similar to the measurement method by classic definition.","PeriodicalId":410202,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2011.23.1.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: We wanted to measure the femoral neck anteversion (FNA) angles using a 3D CT scan that perpendicularly cut the mechanical axis of the femur and to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of different measuring methods. Materials and Methods: We obtained 95 cases of 3D CT images of the cross-section perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. The methods used to measure the FNA angles included a method using the CT image of the area where the femoral neck is confluent to the greater trochanter (method 1), a method using the CT image taken from the neck base immediately prior to the beginning of the area of the lesser trochanter (method 2) and a method by which measurements are made after putting 3D bone models on a horizontal plane in virtual space (method 3). The reference axes of the distal femur we used were the anatomical transepicondylar axis, the surgical transepicondylar axis and the real posterior condylar axis. Results: The FNA angles measured by method 1 were 4.79±6.41。to the anatomical transepicondylar axis (ATEA), 6.09±6.58。to the surgical transepicondylar axis (STEA) and 7.96±6.81。to the real posterior condylar axis (rPCA). The FNA angles measured by method 2 were 16.01±8.31。to the ATEA, 19.52±8.38。to the STEA and 21.79± 8.52。to the rPCA. The FNA angles measured by method 3 were 20.15±12.89。to the rPCA. Conclusion: The measurement of the FNA angle using a 3D CT scan perpendicular to the mechanical axis is reproducible. The measurement method on the neck base level is more reliable than the one on the proximal neck confluence, and more similar to the measurement method by classic definition.
垂直于股骨机械轴的三维CT扫描测量股骨颈前倾
目的:我们希望通过垂直切割股骨机械轴的3D CT扫描来测量股骨颈前倾(FNA)角度,并评估不同测量方法的准确性和可重复性。材料与方法:我们获得了95例垂直于股骨机械轴的三维CT图像。用于测量FNA角度的方法包括使用股骨颈与大转子汇合处的CT图像(方法1);一种方法是使用在小粗隆区域开始之前从颈部底部拍摄的CT图像(方法2),另一种方法是在虚拟空间的水平面上放置3D骨模型后进行测量(方法3)。我们使用的远端股骨的参考轴是解剖学上的经髁轴、外科上的经髁轴和真正的后髁轴。结果:方法1测得FNA角度为4.79±6.41。解剖上经髁轴(ATEA), 6.09±6.58。与手术经髁轴(STEA)的比值为7.96±6.81。到真正的后髁轴(rPCA)方法2测得FNA角度为16.01±8.31。与ATEA的比值为19.52±8.38。与STEA比值为21.79±8.52。到rPCA。方法3测得FNA角度为20.15±12.89。到rPCA。结论:垂直于机械轴的三维CT扫描测量FNA角度是可重复性的。颈基水平的测量方法比颈近端汇合处的测量方法更可靠,更接近经典定义的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信