Axiomatic information modeling

B. Lundberg, J. Bubenko
{"title":"Axiomatic information modeling","authors":"B. Lundberg, J. Bubenko","doi":"10.1145/800227.806906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The obvious task in information modeling is to arrive at a model which is correct. However, the concept of correctness has many faces e g the model must correctly reflect the properties of the application at hand, and it must adequately select relevant parts of the application. The former case requires that the information model is “satisfied by the application”. The latter case is dependent on the intended use of the model. The problem of satisfyability is, in most information modeling approaches, considered to be an intuitive task. From logic we know that a theory, here seen as an information model, can only be satisfied if it is consistent. Thus, by applying predicate logic to information modeling, we should have a possibility of checking the satisfyability of an information model. However, in order to ensure that the information model is satisfied by the application in mind, requires an intuitive reasoning.\n Consequently, our plans include to further elaborate the use of predicate logic in information modeling. It furthermore includes a study of possibilities and limitations of such an approach. The results obtained so far will be shortly reviewed in the following.","PeriodicalId":347815,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Data Abstraction, Databases and Conceptual Modelling","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Data Abstraction, Databases and Conceptual Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800227.806906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The obvious task in information modeling is to arrive at a model which is correct. However, the concept of correctness has many faces e g the model must correctly reflect the properties of the application at hand, and it must adequately select relevant parts of the application. The former case requires that the information model is “satisfied by the application”. The latter case is dependent on the intended use of the model. The problem of satisfyability is, in most information modeling approaches, considered to be an intuitive task. From logic we know that a theory, here seen as an information model, can only be satisfied if it is consistent. Thus, by applying predicate logic to information modeling, we should have a possibility of checking the satisfyability of an information model. However, in order to ensure that the information model is satisfied by the application in mind, requires an intuitive reasoning. Consequently, our plans include to further elaborate the use of predicate logic in information modeling. It furthermore includes a study of possibilities and limitations of such an approach. The results obtained so far will be shortly reviewed in the following.
公理信息建模
信息建模中最明显的任务是得到一个正确的模型。然而,正确性的概念有许多方面,例如模型必须正确地反映当前应用程序的属性,并且必须充分选择应用程序的相关部分。前一种情况要求信息模型“被应用程序满足”。后一种情况取决于模型的预期用途。在大多数信息建模方法中,可满足性问题被认为是一项直观的任务。从逻辑上我们知道,一个理论,在这里被看作是一个信息模型,只有在它是一致的情况下才能被满足。因此,通过将谓词逻辑应用于信息建模,我们应该能够检查信息模型的可满足性。然而,为了确保信息模型被应用程序所满足,需要进行直观的推理。因此,我们的计划包括进一步详细说明谓词逻辑在信息建模中的使用。它还包括对这种方法的可能性和局限性的研究。到目前为止所取得的结果将在下面简短地加以审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信