Effect of perioperative intravenous lignocaine infusion on postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Dr. Anish Augustine, Dr. Shoba Philip
{"title":"Effect of perioperative intravenous lignocaine infusion on postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy","authors":"Dr. Anish Augustine, Dr. Shoba Philip","doi":"10.15406/jaccoa.2021.13.00465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Postoperative pain delays recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy which is done as a daycare surgery. Opioid analgesia carries adverse effects like nausea, vomiting and respiratory depression which can affect postoperative recovery. Our aim was to compare lignocaine infusion with saline infusion as perioperative ERAS measure for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Method: After obtaining ethical clearance, 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised by computer generated codes in to two groups A and B. In group B two subjects were moved out of study, so two in group A were also excluded to make the two groups equal. Group A received saline and group B received 2mg/kg/h lignocaine infusion intravenously which were stopped at the end of the surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed by NRS score at definite time intervals 0 (admission to postoperative anesthesia care unit), 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th and 24th hours. Time at which first rescue analgesia was requested, total analgesic requirements, mean NRS score and side effects were noted. Results: At every time interval, patients in lignocaine group had delayed time to request for rescue analgesia, less analgesic requirements and mean NRS. (P value <0.05). No side effects or signs of toxicity were noted in lignocaine group. Conclusion: Perioperative lignocaine infusion is an efficient, safe and cost-effective armamentarium in implementing ERAS in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","PeriodicalId":228896,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","volume":"323 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2021.13.00465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Postoperative pain delays recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy which is done as a daycare surgery. Opioid analgesia carries adverse effects like nausea, vomiting and respiratory depression which can affect postoperative recovery. Our aim was to compare lignocaine infusion with saline infusion as perioperative ERAS measure for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Method: After obtaining ethical clearance, 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised by computer generated codes in to two groups A and B. In group B two subjects were moved out of study, so two in group A were also excluded to make the two groups equal. Group A received saline and group B received 2mg/kg/h lignocaine infusion intravenously which were stopped at the end of the surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed by NRS score at definite time intervals 0 (admission to postoperative anesthesia care unit), 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th and 24th hours. Time at which first rescue analgesia was requested, total analgesic requirements, mean NRS score and side effects were noted. Results: At every time interval, patients in lignocaine group had delayed time to request for rescue analgesia, less analgesic requirements and mean NRS. (P value <0.05). No side effects or signs of toxicity were noted in lignocaine group. Conclusion: Perioperative lignocaine infusion is an efficient, safe and cost-effective armamentarium in implementing ERAS in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
围术期静脉输注利多卡因对腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的影响
背景和目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种日间护理手术,术后疼痛延迟术后恢复。阿片类镇痛具有恶心、呕吐、呼吸抑制等不良反应,影响术后恢复。我们的目的是比较利多卡因输注与生理盐水输注作为腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后镇痛的围术期ERAS测量。方法:40例腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者在获得伦理许可后,通过计算机生成代码随机分为A组和B组。B组2例受试者被移出研究,因此A组2例受试者也被排除,使两组相等。A组给予生理盐水,B组给予利多卡因2mg/kg/h静脉滴注,手术结束后停止。术后疼痛在确定的时间间隔0(进入术后麻醉护理单元)、2、4、6、8、10、12、24小时采用NRS评分评估。记录首次抢救性镇痛的时间、总镇痛需求、NRS平均评分和副作用。结果:在每个时间间隔,利多卡因组患者请求救援镇痛的时间延迟,镇痛需求减少,平均NRS。(P值<0.05)。利多卡因组未见副作用或毒性迹象。结论:利多卡因输注是腹腔镜胆囊切除术围手术期实施ERAS的一种高效、安全、经济的器械。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信