The efficacy of trazodone in reducing stress related behaviours in hospitalised dogs or dogs confined postsurgery

Lara Dillon
{"title":"The efficacy of trazodone in reducing stress related behaviours in hospitalised dogs or dogs confined postsurgery","authors":"Lara Dillon","doi":"10.18849/ve.v8i2.550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical bottom line\nCategory of research\nTreatment.\nNumber and type of study designs reviewed\nThree papers were critically reviewed. One was a prospective, randomised, blinded observational study, another was a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial, and the last was a non-randomised prospective, open-label clinical trial.\nStrength of evidence\nWeak.\nOutcomes reported\nThe administration of trazodone to hospitalised dogs reduced several observed stress related behaviours compared to a control group that was environmentally matched to the treatment group (Gilbert-Gregory et al., 2016). In dogs subjected to postsurgical confinement at home, trazodone administration was not more effective at reducing stress related behaviours compared with a placebo in one study (Gruen et al., 2017); however, it was effective when observed in a non-placebo controlled clinical trial (Gruen et al., 2014). Further investigation with a larger sample size would assist in strengthening the evidence of an association between trazodone administration and a reduction in the behavioural signs of stress in dogs.\nConclusion\nThe available evidence weakly supports the hypothesis that administration of trazodone is an effective treatment in reducing stress related behaviours in hospitalised dogs and dogs confined post-surgery, and further studies are required to confirm its efficacy. The quality of the evidence when hospitalised dogs was studied was moderate (Gilbert-Gregory et al., 2016), however in dogs studied that were confined postsurgery, the evidence is weaker (Gruen et al., 2014; Gruen et al., 2017). Different trazodone doses were evaluated in the studies and so further studies focusing on dose effects are required to determine appropriate dose rates. Further studies also need to be conducted to evaluate the appropriate length of time that trazodone should be given prior to a stressful event, as well as whether trazodone needs to be used in conjunction with other anxiolytic drugs to optimise efficacy.\n \nHow to apply this evidence in practice\nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.\nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.","PeriodicalId":257905,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Evidence","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i2.550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical bottom line Category of research Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed Three papers were critically reviewed. One was a prospective, randomised, blinded observational study, another was a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial, and the last was a non-randomised prospective, open-label clinical trial. Strength of evidence Weak. Outcomes reported The administration of trazodone to hospitalised dogs reduced several observed stress related behaviours compared to a control group that was environmentally matched to the treatment group (Gilbert-Gregory et al., 2016). In dogs subjected to postsurgical confinement at home, trazodone administration was not more effective at reducing stress related behaviours compared with a placebo in one study (Gruen et al., 2017); however, it was effective when observed in a non-placebo controlled clinical trial (Gruen et al., 2014). Further investigation with a larger sample size would assist in strengthening the evidence of an association between trazodone administration and a reduction in the behavioural signs of stress in dogs. Conclusion The available evidence weakly supports the hypothesis that administration of trazodone is an effective treatment in reducing stress related behaviours in hospitalised dogs and dogs confined post-surgery, and further studies are required to confirm its efficacy. The quality of the evidence when hospitalised dogs was studied was moderate (Gilbert-Gregory et al., 2016), however in dogs studied that were confined postsurgery, the evidence is weaker (Gruen et al., 2014; Gruen et al., 2017). Different trazodone doses were evaluated in the studies and so further studies focusing on dose effects are required to determine appropriate dose rates. Further studies also need to be conducted to evaluate the appropriate length of time that trazodone should be given prior to a stressful event, as well as whether trazodone needs to be used in conjunction with other anxiolytic drugs to optimise efficacy.   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
曲唑酮在减少住院犬或手术后受限犬的压力相关行为方面的疗效
临床底线研究类别治疗。审查的研究设计的数量和类型3篇论文被严格审查。一项是前瞻性、随机、盲法观察性研究,另一项是随机、安慰剂对照临床试验,最后一项是非随机、前瞻性、开放标签临床试验。证据强度:弱。结果报告:与环境与治疗组相匹配的对照组相比,给住院狗服用曲唑酮减少了几种观察到的压力相关行为(Gilbert-Gregory et al., 2016)。在一项研究中,对于在家接受手术后禁闭的狗,曲唑酮在减少压力相关行为方面并不比安慰剂更有效(Gruen et al., 2017);然而,在非安慰剂对照临床试验中观察到它是有效的(Gruen et al., 2014)。更大样本量的进一步调查将有助于加强曲唑酮服用与减少狗的压力行为迹象之间联系的证据。结论曲唑酮能有效降低住院犬和术后受限犬的应激相关行为,尚需进一步研究证实。研究住院犬时的证据质量中等(Gilbert-Gregory et al., 2016),但在研究术后受限犬时,证据质量较弱(Gruen et al., 2014;Gruen等人,2017)。研究中评估了不同的曲唑酮剂量,因此需要进一步研究剂量效应,以确定适当的剂量率。还需要进行进一步的研究,以评估在应激事件发生前曲唑酮应给予的适当时间长度,以及曲唑酮是否需要与其他抗焦虑药物联合使用以优化疗效。如何将证据应用于实践应考虑多种因素,不限于:个人临床专业知识、患者的情况和所有者的价值观、您工作的国家、地点或诊所、您面前的个案、治疗方法和资源的可用性。知识摘要是帮助加强或告知决策的资源。他们不会凌驾于从业者的责任或判断之上,去做对他们照顾的动物最好的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信