Decompressing Legacies of Public Goods Delivery, 1880–2012

{"title":"Decompressing Legacies of Public Goods Delivery, 1880–2012","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/9781108996983.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, I turn to an original dataset of historical public service investments to test a final implication of my theory. While the previous two chapters demonstrated that congruent local governments engage in spatially distinct redistributive politics, my argument holds uneven temporal predictions: the influence of the precolonial past on redistributive politics should be contingent on its congruence with formal institutions. As I show in the following pages, the precolonial past only influences social service delivery following the 1996 decentralization reforms that transferred authority over public goods placement to local governments. Built from archival documents, my historical dataset also enables me to assess a set of possible alternative explanations first raised in Chapter 2. The colonial era brought numerous changes to rural Senegal that have been shown elsewhere to radically alter development trajectories. Could the findings I document be driven by divergent experiences with the colonial state and not exposure to precolonial centralization? I test a range of arguments about colonial influences on long-run development trajectories but find little evidence that colonial legacies mediate those of the precolonial past. Thus, while French colonization did intimately influence the contours of Senegal’s social service infrastructure, the political and economic interests of the colonial state only appear to have shaped proximity to basic services in the colonial and immediate postcolonial period. Colonial effects have almost entirely faded by the early 2000s. In this way, this chapter “decompresses” history to engage in two broader debates animating the recent turn to history among students of political economy of development. By explicitly examining the impact of precolonial and colonial legacies over time, I offer a corrective to the tendency to gloss over the question of temporal process that defines much of our recent interest in historical legacies. As the empirical evidence marshaled in the following pages shows,","PeriodicalId":366233,"journal":{"name":"Precolonial Legacies in Postcolonial Politics","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precolonial Legacies in Postcolonial Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108996983.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter, I turn to an original dataset of historical public service investments to test a final implication of my theory. While the previous two chapters demonstrated that congruent local governments engage in spatially distinct redistributive politics, my argument holds uneven temporal predictions: the influence of the precolonial past on redistributive politics should be contingent on its congruence with formal institutions. As I show in the following pages, the precolonial past only influences social service delivery following the 1996 decentralization reforms that transferred authority over public goods placement to local governments. Built from archival documents, my historical dataset also enables me to assess a set of possible alternative explanations first raised in Chapter 2. The colonial era brought numerous changes to rural Senegal that have been shown elsewhere to radically alter development trajectories. Could the findings I document be driven by divergent experiences with the colonial state and not exposure to precolonial centralization? I test a range of arguments about colonial influences on long-run development trajectories but find little evidence that colonial legacies mediate those of the precolonial past. Thus, while French colonization did intimately influence the contours of Senegal’s social service infrastructure, the political and economic interests of the colonial state only appear to have shaped proximity to basic services in the colonial and immediate postcolonial period. Colonial effects have almost entirely faded by the early 2000s. In this way, this chapter “decompresses” history to engage in two broader debates animating the recent turn to history among students of political economy of development. By explicitly examining the impact of precolonial and colonial legacies over time, I offer a corrective to the tendency to gloss over the question of temporal process that defines much of our recent interest in historical legacies. As the empirical evidence marshaled in the following pages shows,
公共产品交付的减压遗产,1880-2012
在本章中,我转向历史公共服务投资的原始数据集来测试我的理论的最终含义。虽然前两章证明了一致性的地方政府参与了空间上不同的再分配政治,但我的论点持有不均匀的时间预测:前殖民时期对再分配政治的影响应该取决于其与正式制度的一致性。正如我在下面几页所展示的那样,前殖民时期的过去只影响了1996年下放改革后的社会服务提供,该改革将公共产品安置的权力移交给了地方政府。基于档案文件,我的历史数据集还使我能够评估第2章中首先提出的一组可能的替代解释。殖民时代给塞内加尔农村带来了许多变化,这些变化在其他地方已经被证明从根本上改变了发展轨迹。我所记录的这些发现可能是由与殖民国家的不同经历所驱动的,而不是受到殖民前中央集权的影响吗?我测试了一系列关于殖民对长期发展轨迹影响的论点,但发现很少有证据表明殖民遗产调解了前殖民时期的历史。因此,虽然法国殖民确实密切影响了塞内加尔社会服务基础设施的轮廓,但殖民国家的政治和经济利益似乎只在殖民时期和刚结束殖民时期影响了基本服务的接近程度。到21世纪初,殖民的影响几乎完全消失了。通过这种方式,本章对历史进行了“解压”,以参与两个更广泛的辩论,这些辩论激发了发展政治经济学学生最近转向历史的兴趣。通过明确地考察前殖民时期和殖民时期遗产的影响,我纠正了掩盖时间过程问题的倾向,而时间过程定义了我们最近对历史遗产的兴趣。正如下文所列举的经验证据所示,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信