Validation of Dosimetric Comissioning Accuracy of IMRT for Versa HD Linear Accelerator with AAPM TG-119 protocol

Yu. B. Bykova, N. I. Khramtsova, I. I. Shuvaev, N. A. Zaitseva, R. Plavnik
{"title":"Validation of Dosimetric Comissioning Accuracy of IMRT for Versa HD Linear Accelerator with AAPM TG-119 protocol","authors":"Yu. B. Bykova, N. I. Khramtsova, I. I. Shuvaev, N. A. Zaitseva, R. Plavnik","doi":"10.52775/1810-200x-2021-92-4-39-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Verification of the IMRT prior to the introduction the new Versa HD (Elekta) Linac into operation using test examples given in the AAPM TG-119 report. \nMaterials and methods: The verification of plans created both on the basis of the dose prescriptions given in the AAPMTG-119 report and on the basis of the constraints used in the NMRRC was made. The \nplans were verified using a matrix of ionization chambers (MatriXX Evolution) placed in a mini Phantom \n(IBA Dosimetry), using gamma criteria of 3 %/3 mm and 3 %/2 mm at a dose threshold of 10 %. In addition to checking the coincidence of the calculated and measured dose distribution in the plane, a \ncomparison of the dose at the point calculated in the Monaco planning system (Elekta) and measured \nby the CC13 ionization chamber (0.13 cm3 \n, Iba Dosimetry) inside the PTV and in the organ at risk was \ncarried out. \nResults: The difference in the dose measured by the ionization chamber and calculated in the planning \nsystem was less than 2 %, and correlates well with the results of accredited clinics. The measured dose \ndistribution in the plane well (97-100 % of the points) coincided with the calculated one for all localizations. An exception was the test case with several targets, in which the assessment was carried out \naccording to the 3 %/2 mm gamma criterion. \nConclusions: The results obtained when testing IMRT according to the protocol described in the AAPM \nTG-119 report, can be used to compare their results with the results of other accredited clinics.","PeriodicalId":222791,"journal":{"name":"Meditsinskaya Fizika","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditsinskaya Fizika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52775/1810-200x-2021-92-4-39-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Verification of the IMRT prior to the introduction the new Versa HD (Elekta) Linac into operation using test examples given in the AAPM TG-119 report. Materials and methods: The verification of plans created both on the basis of the dose prescriptions given in the AAPMTG-119 report and on the basis of the constraints used in the NMRRC was made. The plans were verified using a matrix of ionization chambers (MatriXX Evolution) placed in a mini Phantom (IBA Dosimetry), using gamma criteria of 3 %/3 mm and 3 %/2 mm at a dose threshold of 10 %. In addition to checking the coincidence of the calculated and measured dose distribution in the plane, a comparison of the dose at the point calculated in the Monaco planning system (Elekta) and measured by the CC13 ionization chamber (0.13 cm3 , Iba Dosimetry) inside the PTV and in the organ at risk was carried out. Results: The difference in the dose measured by the ionization chamber and calculated in the planning system was less than 2 %, and correlates well with the results of accredited clinics. The measured dose distribution in the plane well (97-100 % of the points) coincided with the calculated one for all localizations. An exception was the test case with several targets, in which the assessment was carried out according to the 3 %/2 mm gamma criterion. Conclusions: The results obtained when testing IMRT according to the protocol described in the AAPM TG-119 report, can be used to compare their results with the results of other accredited clinics.
基于AAPM TG-119协议的Versa HD直线加速器IMRT剂量学调测精度验证
目的:使用AAPM TG-119报告中给出的测试示例,在将新的Versa HD (Elekta)直线机投入运行之前验证IMRT。材料和方法:根据AAPMTG-119报告中给出的剂量处方和NMRRC中使用的限制条件,对制定的计划进行了验证。使用放置在迷你幻影(IBA剂量测定)中的电离室矩阵(MatriXX Evolution)验证了这些计划,使用3% / 3mm和3% / 2mm的伽马标准,剂量阈值为10%。除了检查平面内计算和测量剂量分布的一致性外,还对PTV内和危险器官内CC13电离室(0.13 cm3, Iba剂量法)在摩纳哥计划系统(Elekta)计算的点和CC13电离室测量的剂量进行了比较。结果:电离室测量的剂量与规划系统计算的剂量相差小于2%,与认可诊所的结果吻合较好。在平面孔中测量到的剂量分布(97% - 100%的点)与所有定位的计算值一致。一个例外是有几个目标的测试用例,其中评估是根据3% /2 mm伽马标准进行的。结论:根据AAPM TG-119报告中描述的方案进行IMRT检测时获得的结果可用于与其他认可诊所的结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书