Yu. B. Bykova, N. I. Khramtsova, I. I. Shuvaev, N. A. Zaitseva, R. Plavnik
{"title":"Validation of Dosimetric Comissioning Accuracy of IMRT for Versa HD Linear Accelerator with AAPM TG-119 protocol","authors":"Yu. B. Bykova, N. I. Khramtsova, I. I. Shuvaev, N. A. Zaitseva, R. Plavnik","doi":"10.52775/1810-200x-2021-92-4-39-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Verification of the IMRT prior to the introduction the new Versa HD (Elekta) Linac into operation using test examples given in the AAPM TG-119 report. \nMaterials and methods: The verification of plans created both on the basis of the dose prescriptions given in the AAPMTG-119 report and on the basis of the constraints used in the NMRRC was made. The \nplans were verified using a matrix of ionization chambers (MatriXX Evolution) placed in a mini Phantom \n(IBA Dosimetry), using gamma criteria of 3 %/3 mm and 3 %/2 mm at a dose threshold of 10 %. In addition to checking the coincidence of the calculated and measured dose distribution in the plane, a \ncomparison of the dose at the point calculated in the Monaco planning system (Elekta) and measured \nby the CC13 ionization chamber (0.13 cm3 \n, Iba Dosimetry) inside the PTV and in the organ at risk was \ncarried out. \nResults: The difference in the dose measured by the ionization chamber and calculated in the planning \nsystem was less than 2 %, and correlates well with the results of accredited clinics. The measured dose \ndistribution in the plane well (97-100 % of the points) coincided with the calculated one for all localizations. An exception was the test case with several targets, in which the assessment was carried out \naccording to the 3 %/2 mm gamma criterion. \nConclusions: The results obtained when testing IMRT according to the protocol described in the AAPM \nTG-119 report, can be used to compare their results with the results of other accredited clinics.","PeriodicalId":222791,"journal":{"name":"Meditsinskaya Fizika","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditsinskaya Fizika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52775/1810-200x-2021-92-4-39-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Verification of the IMRT prior to the introduction the new Versa HD (Elekta) Linac into operation using test examples given in the AAPM TG-119 report.
Materials and methods: The verification of plans created both on the basis of the dose prescriptions given in the AAPMTG-119 report and on the basis of the constraints used in the NMRRC was made. The
plans were verified using a matrix of ionization chambers (MatriXX Evolution) placed in a mini Phantom
(IBA Dosimetry), using gamma criteria of 3 %/3 mm and 3 %/2 mm at a dose threshold of 10 %. In addition to checking the coincidence of the calculated and measured dose distribution in the plane, a
comparison of the dose at the point calculated in the Monaco planning system (Elekta) and measured
by the CC13 ionization chamber (0.13 cm3
, Iba Dosimetry) inside the PTV and in the organ at risk was
carried out.
Results: The difference in the dose measured by the ionization chamber and calculated in the planning
system was less than 2 %, and correlates well with the results of accredited clinics. The measured dose
distribution in the plane well (97-100 % of the points) coincided with the calculated one for all localizations. An exception was the test case with several targets, in which the assessment was carried out
according to the 3 %/2 mm gamma criterion.
Conclusions: The results obtained when testing IMRT according to the protocol described in the AAPM
TG-119 report, can be used to compare their results with the results of other accredited clinics.