Score matrix optimization for quartz binding peptides using evolutionary strategy

Baris Senliol, Z. Cataltepe
{"title":"Score matrix optimization for quartz binding peptides using evolutionary strategy","authors":"Baris Senliol, Z. Cataltepe","doi":"10.1109/SIU.2009.5136414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding new peptides that can bind to some inorganic materials with high affinity and specificity is an active research problem with many application areas ranging from medicine to electronics. While it is easier to design peptides in-silico, in-vitro testing of binding is a slow and expensive process. Peptides with similar structure usually have similar functions. Score matrices, such as Blosum, PAM and Gonnet are used to score amino acid replacements in alignment algorithms such as Needleman-Wunsch or Smith-Waterman which measure similarity between two sequences. These score matrices may not represent the frequency of amino-acids replacement for experimental data. Score matrices which are optimized for specific peptide class or function have an important effect on accurate classification of artificial or newly discovered peptides. In this paper, score matrices that are specific to quartz binding peptides are derived using an evolutionary strategy (ES) and performance of these matrices are compared with the Quartz I matrix of Oren et.al. (2007). Results show that the matrices which obtained from the ES have better performance than Quartz I matrix when TSS (total similarity score) is used as a performance measurement criterion. Using ES scoring matrices and TSS for classifying peptides as strong, moderate or weak has performed 30% better in terms of accuracy and 40% better in terms of the number of inversions of affinity ordering of peptides than Quartz I matrix.","PeriodicalId":219938,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE 17th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE 17th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2009.5136414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finding new peptides that can bind to some inorganic materials with high affinity and specificity is an active research problem with many application areas ranging from medicine to electronics. While it is easier to design peptides in-silico, in-vitro testing of binding is a slow and expensive process. Peptides with similar structure usually have similar functions. Score matrices, such as Blosum, PAM and Gonnet are used to score amino acid replacements in alignment algorithms such as Needleman-Wunsch or Smith-Waterman which measure similarity between two sequences. These score matrices may not represent the frequency of amino-acids replacement for experimental data. Score matrices which are optimized for specific peptide class or function have an important effect on accurate classification of artificial or newly discovered peptides. In this paper, score matrices that are specific to quartz binding peptides are derived using an evolutionary strategy (ES) and performance of these matrices are compared with the Quartz I matrix of Oren et.al. (2007). Results show that the matrices which obtained from the ES have better performance than Quartz I matrix when TSS (total similarity score) is used as a performance measurement criterion. Using ES scoring matrices and TSS for classifying peptides as strong, moderate or weak has performed 30% better in terms of accuracy and 40% better in terms of the number of inversions of affinity ordering of peptides than Quartz I matrix.
基于进化策略的石英结合肽评分矩阵优化
寻找能与无机材料高亲和力和特异性结合的新多肽是一个活跃的研究问题,从医学到电子等许多应用领域。虽然在硅上设计肽更容易,但体外结合测试是一个缓慢而昂贵的过程。结构相似的多肽通常具有相似的功能。评分矩阵,如Blosum, PAM和Gonnet,用于在Needleman-Wunsch或Smith-Waterman等测量两个序列之间相似性的比对算法中对氨基酸替换进行评分。这些分数矩阵可能不代表氨基酸替换实验数据的频率。针对特定肽类或功能进行优化的评分矩阵对人工或新发现肽的准确分类具有重要作用。本文使用进化策略(ES)衍生出石英结合肽特异性的分数矩阵,并将这些矩阵的性能与Oren等人的石英I矩阵进行了比较。(2007)。结果表明,以总相似度评分(TSS)作为性能衡量标准时,ES得到的矩阵的性能优于石英I矩阵。使用ES评分矩阵和TSS对多肽进行强、中、弱分类的准确性比石英I矩阵高30%,多肽亲和顺序反转的数量比石英I矩阵高40%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信