Between Exclusion and Intersection: Heidegger’s Philosophy and Jewish Volkism1

Daniel M. Herskowitz
{"title":"Between Exclusion and Intersection: Heidegger’s Philosophy and Jewish Volkism1","authors":"Daniel M. Herskowitz","doi":"10.1093/leobaeck/ybz018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article deals with some unexplored Jewish resp.onses to the volkish elements in Martin Heidegger’s philosophy. Heidegger’s idiosyncratic and deeply philosophical account of volkism stood at the heart of his political support of National Socialism and of his exclusion of the Jews from the ontological task of thinking. This article demonstrates, however, that some of Heidegger’s Jewish readers identified with volkish moments in his philosophy and found these to be pertinent to their own condition as Jews in the modern world. This was made possible by the fact that, within the intellectual climate in which Heidegger’s thinking took shape, the volkish lexicon (Volk, Gemeinschaft, ‘fate’, ‘destiny’, and even ‘struggle’) was commonplace, indicated no clear association with any certain political view, and, indeed, was a central organ through which Jews made sense of their own existence and historical and political situation. Thus, while Heidegger’s volkism led to a philosophical marginalization of Jews, the multifariousness and widespread currency of volkish thinking brought some Jewish readers to recognize their shared conceptual horizon with Heidegger and to differentiate between Heidegger’s practical politics, which were anti-Jewish and loathsome, and his volkism, which was seen as fitting and useful for the Jewish case.","PeriodicalId":391272,"journal":{"name":"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/leobaeck/ybz018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This article deals with some unexplored Jewish resp.onses to the volkish elements in Martin Heidegger’s philosophy. Heidegger’s idiosyncratic and deeply philosophical account of volkism stood at the heart of his political support of National Socialism and of his exclusion of the Jews from the ontological task of thinking. This article demonstrates, however, that some of Heidegger’s Jewish readers identified with volkish moments in his philosophy and found these to be pertinent to their own condition as Jews in the modern world. This was made possible by the fact that, within the intellectual climate in which Heidegger’s thinking took shape, the volkish lexicon (Volk, Gemeinschaft, ‘fate’, ‘destiny’, and even ‘struggle’) was commonplace, indicated no clear association with any certain political view, and, indeed, was a central organ through which Jews made sense of their own existence and historical and political situation. Thus, while Heidegger’s volkism led to a philosophical marginalization of Jews, the multifariousness and widespread currency of volkish thinking brought some Jewish readers to recognize their shared conceptual horizon with Heidegger and to differentiate between Heidegger’s practical politics, which were anti-Jewish and loathsome, and his volkism, which was seen as fitting and useful for the Jewish case.
在排斥与交集之间:海德格尔哲学与犹太民族主义
这篇文章涉及一些未被探索的犹太人的问题。马丁·海德格尔哲学中的民族元素。海德格尔对民族主义的独特而深刻的哲学解释是他对国家社会主义的政治支持以及他将犹太人排除在思考本体论任务之外的核心。然而,这篇文章表明,海德格尔的一些犹太读者认同他哲学中的民族主义时刻,并发现这些时刻与他们自己作为犹太人在现代世界中的处境有关。这是可能的,因为在海德格尔思想形成的知识氛围中,大众词汇(Volk, Gemeinschaft,“命运”,“命运”,甚至“斗争”)是司空寻常的,表明与任何特定的政治观点没有明确的联系,实际上,是犹太人理解自己的存在以及历史和政治处境的中心器官。因此,虽然海德格尔的民族主义导致了犹太人在哲学上的边缘化,但民族主义思想的多样性和广泛传播使一些犹太读者认识到他们与海德格尔共有的概念视界,并区分海德格尔的反犹太人和令人厌恶的实践政治,以及他的民族主义,这被视为适合和有用的犹太人的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信