Where are we at? A review of the advances in the ethical aspects of human-robot collaboration

T. Callari, A. Oostveen, Ella‐Mae Hubbard, S. Fletcher, N. Lohse
{"title":"Where are we at? A review of the advances in the ethical aspects of human-robot collaboration","authors":"T. Callari, A. Oostveen, Ella‐Mae Hubbard, S. Fletcher, N. Lohse","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human-robot collaboration (HRC) is revolutionising the future of manufacturing and service industries. Ethical research on HRC regards all issues of safeguarding humans from unintended and potentially unethical risks and hazards associated with collaborative robots (also known as “cobots”). Within the CoBots domain, the term Roboethics has been coined to refer to the social and ethical aspects of the design, development, and employment of collaborative and intelligent robots, which could be clustered in four typologies: (1) robots as machines; (2) robots may have an intrinsic ethical dimension and be able to trigger emotions and feelings from users; (3) robots are seen as moral agents; (4) robots are an evolution of a new species, having a conscience and greater intellectual dimensions. This paper aims to provide a review of the available literature in the field to map the ethical aspects and concerns that are discussed in the HRC domain, taking into account the above Roboethics typologies. The paper will conclude outlining an agenda for future ethical research in HRC, specifically where current gaps emerge.","PeriodicalId":363648,"journal":{"name":"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-robot collaboration (HRC) is revolutionising the future of manufacturing and service industries. Ethical research on HRC regards all issues of safeguarding humans from unintended and potentially unethical risks and hazards associated with collaborative robots (also known as “cobots”). Within the CoBots domain, the term Roboethics has been coined to refer to the social and ethical aspects of the design, development, and employment of collaborative and intelligent robots, which could be clustered in four typologies: (1) robots as machines; (2) robots may have an intrinsic ethical dimension and be able to trigger emotions and feelings from users; (3) robots are seen as moral agents; (4) robots are an evolution of a new species, having a conscience and greater intellectual dimensions. This paper aims to provide a review of the available literature in the field to map the ethical aspects and concerns that are discussed in the HRC domain, taking into account the above Roboethics typologies. The paper will conclude outlining an agenda for future ethical research in HRC, specifically where current gaps emerge.
我们在哪里?人机协作伦理方面的进展综述
人机协作(HRC)正在彻底改变制造业和服务业的未来。HRC的伦理研究涉及保护人类免受与协作机器人(也称为“cobots”)相关的意外和潜在不道德风险和危害的所有问题。在协作机器人领域,“机器人伦理”一词被创造出来,指的是协作和智能机器人的设计、开发和使用的社会和伦理方面,可以分为四种类型:(1)作为机器的机器人;(2)机器人可能具有内在的伦理维度,能够触发用户的情感和感受;(3)机器人被视为道德代理人;机器人是一种新物种的进化,有良知和更大的智力维度。本文旨在回顾该领域的现有文献,以映射HRC领域中讨论的伦理方面和关注点,同时考虑到上述机器人伦理学类型学。论文最后将概述未来HRC伦理研究的议程,特别是目前出现的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信