Feminist Vulnerability Politics: Judith Butler on Autonomy and the Pursuit of a "Livable Life"

Amber Knight
{"title":"Feminist Vulnerability Politics: Judith Butler on Autonomy and the Pursuit of a \"Livable Life\"","authors":"Amber Knight","doi":"10.1353/ff.2021.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article contributes to ongoing feminist debates about the politics of vulnerability by attempting to clarify vulnerability's relationship to autonomy. Building from Judith Butler's recent work—specifically her precariousness/precarity distinction—I argue that vulnerability can both enable and limit autonomy, depending on the type of vulnerability in question. Specifically, precariousness accentuates the positive and generative dimensions of vulnerability on autonomy, while precarity indicates unjust constraints on one's ability to exercise some degree of self-determination. My hope is that this clarification can be of assistance in discerning whether vulnerability can be of practical value for feminist social justice movements. If we think about respect for persons as autonomous agents as a core feminist value, then the aim of political responses to vulnerability must be developed in a way that enables autonomy, lest the discourse of vulnerability be co-opted to legitimize and sanction reactionary politics.","PeriodicalId":190295,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Formations","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Formations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2021.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article contributes to ongoing feminist debates about the politics of vulnerability by attempting to clarify vulnerability's relationship to autonomy. Building from Judith Butler's recent work—specifically her precariousness/precarity distinction—I argue that vulnerability can both enable and limit autonomy, depending on the type of vulnerability in question. Specifically, precariousness accentuates the positive and generative dimensions of vulnerability on autonomy, while precarity indicates unjust constraints on one's ability to exercise some degree of self-determination. My hope is that this clarification can be of assistance in discerning whether vulnerability can be of practical value for feminist social justice movements. If we think about respect for persons as autonomous agents as a core feminist value, then the aim of political responses to vulnerability must be developed in a way that enables autonomy, lest the discourse of vulnerability be co-opted to legitimize and sanction reactionary politics.
女性主义脆弱性政治:朱迪思·巴特勒论自主性与对“宜居生活”的追求
摘要:本文试图阐明脆弱性与自主性的关系,从而为女性主义关于脆弱性政治的争论做出贡献。根据朱迪思·巴特勒(Judith Butler)最近的作品,特别是她对不稳定性/不稳定性的区分,我认为脆弱性既可以促进自主,也可以限制自主,这取决于脆弱性的类型。具体而言,不稳定性强调了自主性脆弱性的积极和生成方面,而不稳定性则表明对行使某种程度的自决能力的不公正限制。我希望这一澄清能够有助于辨别脆弱性是否对女权主义社会正义运动具有实际价值。如果我们把尊重作为自主主体的人作为女权主义的核心价值,那么对脆弱的政治回应的目标必须以一种允许自主的方式发展,以免脆弱的话语被用来合法化和制裁反动的政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信