A Learning-to-Rank Based Approach for Improving Regression Test Case Prioritization

Chu-Ti Lin, Sheng-Hsiang Yuan, Jutarporn Intasara
{"title":"A Learning-to-Rank Based Approach for Improving Regression Test Case Prioritization","authors":"Chu-Ti Lin, Sheng-Hsiang Yuan, Jutarporn Intasara","doi":"10.1109/APSEC53868.2021.00075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many prior studies with attempt to improve regression testing adopt test case prioritization (TCP). TCP generally arranges the execution of regression test cases according to specific rules with the goal of revealing faults as early as possible. It is noted that different TCP algorithms adopt different metrics to evaluate test cases' priority so that they may be effect at revealing faults early in different faulty programs. Adopting a single metric may not generally work well. In this decade, learning-to-rank (LTR) strategies have been adopted to address some software engineering problems. This study also uses a pairwise LTR strategy XGBoost to combine several existing metrics so as to improve TCP effectiveness. More specifically, we regard the metrics adopted by TCP techniques to evaluate test cases' priority as the features of the training data and adopt XGBoost to learn the weights of the combined metrics. Additionally, in order to avoid overfitting, we use a fuzzy inference system to generate additional features for data augmentation. The experimental results show that our approach achieves more excellent effectiveness than the existing TCP techniques with respect to the selected subject programs.","PeriodicalId":143800,"journal":{"name":"2021 28th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 28th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC53868.2021.00075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many prior studies with attempt to improve regression testing adopt test case prioritization (TCP). TCP generally arranges the execution of regression test cases according to specific rules with the goal of revealing faults as early as possible. It is noted that different TCP algorithms adopt different metrics to evaluate test cases' priority so that they may be effect at revealing faults early in different faulty programs. Adopting a single metric may not generally work well. In this decade, learning-to-rank (LTR) strategies have been adopted to address some software engineering problems. This study also uses a pairwise LTR strategy XGBoost to combine several existing metrics so as to improve TCP effectiveness. More specifically, we regard the metrics adopted by TCP techniques to evaluate test cases' priority as the features of the training data and adopt XGBoost to learn the weights of the combined metrics. Additionally, in order to avoid overfitting, we use a fuzzy inference system to generate additional features for data augmentation. The experimental results show that our approach achieves more excellent effectiveness than the existing TCP techniques with respect to the selected subject programs.
一种基于学习排序的改进回归测试用例优先级的方法
许多先前的研究试图改进回归测试,采用测试用例优先级(TCP)。TCP一般按照特定的规则安排回归测试用例的执行,目的是尽早发现故障。值得注意的是,不同的TCP算法采用不同的度量来评估测试用例的优先级,以便它们可能在不同的错误程序中及早发现错误。采用单一的度量标准通常可能效果不佳。在这十年中,学习排序(LTR)策略被用来解决一些软件工程问题。本研究还使用了配对LTR策略XGBoost来结合几个现有的指标,以提高TCP的有效性。更具体地说,我们将TCP技术用于评估测试用例优先级的指标作为训练数据的特征,并采用XGBoost来学习组合指标的权重。此外,为了避免过拟合,我们使用模糊推理系统来生成用于数据增强的附加特征。实验结果表明,对于所选的主题程序,我们的方法比现有的TCP技术取得了更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信