EVALUATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY OF THE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS BASED ON THE RATING OF THE TEACHING STAFF

O. S. Koshevoy
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY OF THE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS BASED ON THE RATING OF THE TEACHING STAFF","authors":"O. S. Koshevoy","doi":"10.14258/epb202207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scientific activity of universities is one of the most important elements of the educational environment of an educational organization, aimed primarily at providing high-quality graduate training that meets modern requirements for ensuring the fulfillment of strategic tasks of state development. \nThe purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for evaluating the research work of the university department that meets the general theoretical methods of its organization. \nGiven the structure of most universities, which is based on institutes (faculties) and departments, it is quite difficult to carry out an objective assessment of the research work of the department, since the teaching staff of the department implements tasks for teaching students in disciplines that are not directly related to the name and scientific direction of the department. The Institute of Cathedral scientific schools also does not reflect an objective assessment of the activities of the entire teaching staff, and is, as a rule, formal in nature. Based on this, the research work of the teaching staff of the departments is evaluated within the framework of a general rating assessment, which has a number of significant drawbacks, both from the point of view of objectivity and the methodology of its construction.","PeriodicalId":230380,"journal":{"name":"Economics Profession Business","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Profession Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14258/epb202207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scientific activity of universities is one of the most important elements of the educational environment of an educational organization, aimed primarily at providing high-quality graduate training that meets modern requirements for ensuring the fulfillment of strategic tasks of state development. The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for evaluating the research work of the university department that meets the general theoretical methods of its organization. Given the structure of most universities, which is based on institutes (faculties) and departments, it is quite difficult to carry out an objective assessment of the research work of the department, since the teaching staff of the department implements tasks for teaching students in disciplines that are not directly related to the name and scientific direction of the department. The Institute of Cathedral scientific schools also does not reflect an objective assessment of the activities of the entire teaching staff, and is, as a rule, formal in nature. Based on this, the research work of the teaching staff of the departments is evaluated within the framework of a general rating assessment, which has a number of significant drawbacks, both from the point of view of objectivity and the methodology of its construction.
以教学人员的评价为基础对大学院系的科学活动进行评价
大学的科学活动是一个教育组织的教育环境的最重要的组成部分之一,其主要目的是提供高质量的研究生培养,以满足确保实现国家发展战略任务的现代要求。本研究的目的是发展一种评估大学院系研究工作的方法,以满足其组织的一般理论方法。在大多数大学以院(系)系为单位的结构下,由于院系的教学人员所承担的教学任务与院系的名称和科学方向没有直接关系,因此很难对院系的研究工作进行客观评价。大教堂科学学院也不反映对整个教学人员活动的客观评价,通常是形式上的。在此基础上,对各院系教学人员的研究工作进行一般等级评价,这种评价方法在客观性和构建方法上都存在明显的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信