Performance of constructed wetlands for the treatment of high strength organic effluents in northeastern Thailand

N. Chuersuwan, P. Suwanvaree, S. Chuersuwan
{"title":"Performance of constructed wetlands for the treatment of high strength organic effluents in northeastern Thailand","authors":"N. Chuersuwan, P. Suwanvaree, S. Chuersuwan","doi":"10.1109/ICEEA.2010.5596139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of present study was to evaluate the removal efficiency of high strength organic wastewater using experiment scale of constructed wetlands by comparing the free water surface flow (FWS) and subsurface flow (SF) systems. The emergent plant employed was Cyperus sp. The average removal efficiencies for both systems were 57.8–61.4%, 79.9–86.8%, 88.6–92.0%, 46.9–58.1%, and 79.9–91.2% for BOD<inf>5</inf>, COD, TKN, NO<sup>−</sup><inf>3</inf>-N and TP, respectively. High removal efficiencies for both wetland systems were TKN and TP whereas NO<inf>3</inf>-N removals were lower than other parameters. Mean removal efficiencies indicated that the SF systems were higher than the FWS constructed wetlands. Based on the t-test analysis, the average removal efficiencies of COD, TKN and TP for SF were significantly higher than FWS. In addition, relationships between BOD<inf>5</inf> removals and initial BOD<inf>5</inf> concentrations indicated a fairly significant linear relationship for the SF systems (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.59) and the FWS (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.54). Furthermore, COD removal were significantly influent by inflow COD concentrations as indicated by a strong significant linear relationship for SF (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.89) and FWS systems (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.90).","PeriodicalId":262661,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Environmental Engineering and Applications","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Environmental Engineering and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEA.2010.5596139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of present study was to evaluate the removal efficiency of high strength organic wastewater using experiment scale of constructed wetlands by comparing the free water surface flow (FWS) and subsurface flow (SF) systems. The emergent plant employed was Cyperus sp. The average removal efficiencies for both systems were 57.8–61.4%, 79.9–86.8%, 88.6–92.0%, 46.9–58.1%, and 79.9–91.2% for BOD5, COD, TKN, NO3-N and TP, respectively. High removal efficiencies for both wetland systems were TKN and TP whereas NO3-N removals were lower than other parameters. Mean removal efficiencies indicated that the SF systems were higher than the FWS constructed wetlands. Based on the t-test analysis, the average removal efficiencies of COD, TKN and TP for SF were significantly higher than FWS. In addition, relationships between BOD5 removals and initial BOD5 concentrations indicated a fairly significant linear relationship for the SF systems (R2 = 0.59) and the FWS (R2 = 0.54). Furthermore, COD removal were significantly influent by inflow COD concentrations as indicated by a strong significant linear relationship for SF (R2 = 0.89) and FWS systems (R2 = 0.90).
泰国东北部人工湿地处理高浓度有机废水的性能研究
本研究通过比较自由水面流(FWS)和地下流(SF)系统对人工湿地高强度有机废水的去除效果,以实验规模评价人工湿地对高浓度有机废水的去除效果。两种系统对BOD5、COD、TKN、NO−3-N和TP的平均去除率分别为57.8 ~ 61.4%、77.9 ~ 86.8%、88.6 ~ 92.0%、46.9 ~ 58.1%和77.9 ~ 91.2%。两种湿地系统对TKN和TP的去除率均较高,对NO3-N的去除率低于其他参数。平均去除效率表明,SF系统高于FWS人工湿地。经t检验分析,COD、TKN、TP对SF的平均去除率显著高于FWS。此外,BOD5去除率与初始BOD5浓度之间的关系表明,SF系统(R2 = 0.59)和FWS (R2 = 0.54)具有相当显著的线性关系。此外,COD去除率受进水COD浓度的显著影响,SF系统(R2 = 0.89)和FWS系统(R2 = 0.90)之间存在显著的线性关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信