Essay Question Generator based on Bloom’s Taxonomy for Assessing Automated Essay Scoring System

Jennifer O. Contreras, Shadi M. S. Hilles, Z. Bakar
{"title":"Essay Question Generator based on Bloom’s Taxonomy for Assessing Automated Essay Scoring System","authors":"Jennifer O. Contreras, Shadi M. S. Hilles, Z. Bakar","doi":"10.1109/ICSCEE50312.2021.9498166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An automated essay scoring system (AES) is advantageous in evaluating student’s learning outcomes since it gives them the chance to exhibit their knowledge. Most of the AES is using machine learning (ML) to enhance student’s scores but did not consider the proper construction of the essay questions. This study aims to integrate the cognitive level of Blooms’ taxonomy (BT) in constructing essay questions and compare the scores of the student. Identifying the most appropriate ML method in classifying essay exam questions (EEQ) based on BT that will be embedded in the Essay Question Generator (EQG). Using F1-Measure, the evaluation results show that the Support Vector Machine (SVM) (85.7%) outperforms Naïve Bayes (82.6%) and K-Nearest Neighbor (77.6%). Therefore, SVM together with the NLP techniques is applied to automatically extract essay questions from the given text for the teachers to select and apply. The EQG was evaluated using the scores of 375 students who answered two sets of essay exam questions using Bloom’s Taxonomy (BT) and without Bloom’s taxonomy (NBT). Using frequency distribution, the scores between two types were evaluated and the result shows that most students performed well in answering the essay exam using BT 5.6% of the students obtains a perfect score of 5.0 but nobody got 5.0 for NBT. In a conclusion, this study shows that the essay questions constructed according to BT cognitive level produce higher scores using EQG when compared to exam questions prepared by the teachers.","PeriodicalId":252529,"journal":{"name":"2021 2nd International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise (ICSCEE)","volume":"238 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 2nd International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise (ICSCEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCEE50312.2021.9498166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An automated essay scoring system (AES) is advantageous in evaluating student’s learning outcomes since it gives them the chance to exhibit their knowledge. Most of the AES is using machine learning (ML) to enhance student’s scores but did not consider the proper construction of the essay questions. This study aims to integrate the cognitive level of Blooms’ taxonomy (BT) in constructing essay questions and compare the scores of the student. Identifying the most appropriate ML method in classifying essay exam questions (EEQ) based on BT that will be embedded in the Essay Question Generator (EQG). Using F1-Measure, the evaluation results show that the Support Vector Machine (SVM) (85.7%) outperforms Naïve Bayes (82.6%) and K-Nearest Neighbor (77.6%). Therefore, SVM together with the NLP techniques is applied to automatically extract essay questions from the given text for the teachers to select and apply. The EQG was evaluated using the scores of 375 students who answered two sets of essay exam questions using Bloom’s Taxonomy (BT) and without Bloom’s taxonomy (NBT). Using frequency distribution, the scores between two types were evaluated and the result shows that most students performed well in answering the essay exam using BT 5.6% of the students obtains a perfect score of 5.0 but nobody got 5.0 for NBT. In a conclusion, this study shows that the essay questions constructed according to BT cognitive level produce higher scores using EQG when compared to exam questions prepared by the teachers.
基于Bloom分类法的论文问题生成器,用于评估自动论文评分系统
自动作文评分系统(AES)在评估学生的学习成果是有利的,因为它给了他们展示自己知识的机会。大多数AES使用机器学习(ML)来提高学生的分数,但没有考虑论文问题的正确结构。本研究旨在整合bloom分类法(BT)在写作问题建构中的认知水平,并比较学生的分数。确定最合适的ML方法来分类基于BT的论文考试问题(EEQ),将嵌入到论文问题生成器(EQG)中。使用F1-Measure进行评价,结果表明支持向量机(SVM)(85.7%)优于Naïve贝叶斯(82.6%)和k -最近邻(77.6%)。因此,我们将支持向量机与自然语言处理技术相结合,从给定文本中自动提取作文题,供教师选择和应用。EQG是根据375名学生的分数来评估的,这些学生分别回答了使用布鲁姆分类法(BT)和不使用布鲁姆分类法(NBT)的两组作文考试问题。利用频率分布对两种类型的分数进行了评估,结果表明,大多数学生在使用BT的作文考试中表现良好,5.6%的学生获得5.0分的满分,但没有人获得5.0分。综上所述,本研究表明,与教师准备的考试题目相比,根据BT认知水平构建的论文题目使用EQG可以获得更高的分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信