Development of assessment instruments 4C skills (critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and creativity) on parabolic motion materials

R. Rudianto, R. Diani, S. Subandi, Nanda Widiawati
{"title":"Development of assessment instruments 4C skills (critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and creativity) on parabolic motion materials","authors":"R. Rudianto, R. Diani, S. Subandi, Nanda Widiawati","doi":"10.58524/jasme.v2i2.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"4C skills are one of the abilities in life that can produce knowledge personally and be used in society. This study aimed to develop an instrument for assessing students' 4C skills (Critical Thinking, Collaboration, Communication, and Creativity) on parabolic motion material. The model used in developing this research is the ADDIE model, which consists of five stages: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Data collection methods were interviews, questionnaires, tests, and documentation with a population of 120 students and a sample of 60 students. The sample selection technique uses cluster random sampling. Based on the study results, the percentage of critical thinking criteria was 21.7 %, low critical thinking was 28.3%, and poor critical thinking was 50%. The percentages with creative thinking criteria are 25%, 40% moderately creative, and 35% less creative. The percentage of collaboration skills that meet excellent criteria is 65%, and high collaboration skills are 35%. While the percentage of people with excellent communication skills was 8.3%, high communication skill was 83.3%, and fairly high communication skill was  8.3%. Based on these data, it concluded that the instruments developed were valid and feasible to use.","PeriodicalId":140761,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v2i2.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

4C skills are one of the abilities in life that can produce knowledge personally and be used in society. This study aimed to develop an instrument for assessing students' 4C skills (Critical Thinking, Collaboration, Communication, and Creativity) on parabolic motion material. The model used in developing this research is the ADDIE model, which consists of five stages: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Data collection methods were interviews, questionnaires, tests, and documentation with a population of 120 students and a sample of 60 students. The sample selection technique uses cluster random sampling. Based on the study results, the percentage of critical thinking criteria was 21.7 %, low critical thinking was 28.3%, and poor critical thinking was 50%. The percentages with creative thinking criteria are 25%, 40% moderately creative, and 35% less creative. The percentage of collaboration skills that meet excellent criteria is 65%, and high collaboration skills are 35%. While the percentage of people with excellent communication skills was 8.3%, high communication skill was 83.3%, and fairly high communication skill was  8.3%. Based on these data, it concluded that the instruments developed were valid and feasible to use.
发展抛物线运动材料的评估工具4C技能(批判性思维,协作,沟通和创造力)
4C技能是生活中能够产生个人知识并用于社会的能力之一。本研究旨在开发一个工具来评估学生在抛物线运动材料上的4C技能(批判性思维、协作、沟通和创造力)。本研究使用的模型是ADDIE模型,该模型包括五个阶段:分析、设计、开发、实施和评估。数据收集方法包括访谈、问卷调查、测试和文献记录,共120名学生和60名学生作为样本。样本选择技术采用聚类随机抽样。根据研究结果,批判性思维标准的比例为21.7%,低批判性思维的比例为28.3%,差批判性思维的比例为50%。具有创造性思维标准的比例为25%,中等创造性的比例为40%,创造力较差的比例为35%。符合优秀标准的协作技能的百分比是65%,高协作技能的百分比是35%。沟通能力优秀的占8.3%,沟通能力高的占83.3%,沟通能力相当高的占8.3%。根据这些数据,得出结论,所开发的仪器是有效和可行的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信