The Long Arm of the Law

Richard S. Frase, Julian V. Roberts
{"title":"The Long Arm of the Law","authors":"Richard S. Frase, Julian V. Roberts","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190254001.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the question of whether and when prior convictions from many years past should no longer be considered at sentencing. The chapter first surveys the varying “look-back” and crime-free “gap” rules found in American guidelines systems, noting that many jurisdictions have no look-back limits for some or all offenders. This discussion also examines the question of when the look-back “clock” starts to run, in applying each of the existing rules—that date could be as early as the date of the prior sentencing, or as late as discharge from probation or parole. The chapter then considers the ways in which different approaches to look-back relate to the punishment rationales—offender risk and culpability—that are thought to justify criminal history enhancements. It also presents a summary of recent research surveying public opinion about the desirability and formulation of look-back limits. The chapter concludes with proposals to limit look-back.","PeriodicalId":301321,"journal":{"name":"Paying for the Past","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paying for the Past","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190254001.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines the question of whether and when prior convictions from many years past should no longer be considered at sentencing. The chapter first surveys the varying “look-back” and crime-free “gap” rules found in American guidelines systems, noting that many jurisdictions have no look-back limits for some or all offenders. This discussion also examines the question of when the look-back “clock” starts to run, in applying each of the existing rules—that date could be as early as the date of the prior sentencing, or as late as discharge from probation or parole. The chapter then considers the ways in which different approaches to look-back relate to the punishment rationales—offender risk and culpability—that are thought to justify criminal history enhancements. It also presents a summary of recent research surveying public opinion about the desirability and formulation of look-back limits. The chapter concludes with proposals to limit look-back.
法律的长臂
本章审查在量刑时是否以及何时不再考虑多年前的先前定罪的问题。本章首先调查了在美国指导体系中发现的不同的“回顾”和无犯罪“空白”规则,并指出许多司法管辖区对部分或全部罪犯没有回顾限制。本讨论还探讨了在应用现有规则时,回顾“时钟”何时开始运行的问题——这个日期可以早于先前判决之日,也可以晚于缓刑或假释释放之日。然后,本章考虑了不同的回顾方法与惩罚理由的关系——罪犯的风险和罪责——这些被认为是证明增强犯罪历史的理由。它还概述了最近调查公众对回顾限制的可取性和制定的意见的研究。本章最后提出了限制回顾的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信