Comparing Front-to-Front and Front-to-End Heuristics in Bidirectional Search

Lior Siag, Shahaf S. Shperberg, Ariel Felner, Nathan R Sturtevant
{"title":"Comparing Front-to-Front and Front-to-End Heuristics in Bidirectional Search","authors":"Lior Siag, Shahaf S. Shperberg, Ariel Felner, Nathan R Sturtevant","doi":"10.1609/socs.v16i1.27296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most recent theoretical and algorithmic work in bidirectional heuristic search (BiHS) used front-to-end (F2E) heuristics that estimate the distance to the start and goal states. In this paper, we start exploring front-to-front (F2F) heuristics, which estimate the distance between any pair of states. Devising efficient algorithms that use F2F heuristics is a challenging task. Thus, it is important to first understand the benefits of using F2F heuristics compared to F2E heuristics. To this end, we theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that there is a great potential in using F2F heuristics implying that F2F BiHS is a promising area of future research.","PeriodicalId":425645,"journal":{"name":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v16i1.27296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most recent theoretical and algorithmic work in bidirectional heuristic search (BiHS) used front-to-end (F2E) heuristics that estimate the distance to the start and goal states. In this paper, we start exploring front-to-front (F2F) heuristics, which estimate the distance between any pair of states. Devising efficient algorithms that use F2F heuristics is a challenging task. Thus, it is important to first understand the benefits of using F2F heuristics compared to F2E heuristics. To this end, we theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that there is a great potential in using F2F heuristics implying that F2F BiHS is a promising area of future research.
双向搜索中前端到前端和前端到端启发式的比较
最近在双向启发式搜索(BiHS)中的理论和算法工作使用前端到端(F2E)启发式来估计到起始状态和目标状态的距离。在本文中,我们开始探索前对前(F2F)启发式,它估计任何状态对之间的距离。设计使用F2F启发式的高效算法是一项具有挑战性的任务。因此,首先了解使用F2F启发式与使用F2E启发式相比的好处是很重要的。为此,我们从理论上和实验上证明,使用F2F启发式具有巨大的潜力,这意味着F2F BiHS是未来研究的一个有前途的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信