Evaluation of a Low-Cost Aerosol Sensor to Assess Dust Concentrations in a Swine Building.

Samuel Jones, T. Anthony, Sinan Sousan, Ralph W. Altmaier, Jae Hong Park, T. Peters
{"title":"Evaluation of a Low-Cost Aerosol Sensor to Assess Dust Concentrations in a Swine Building.","authors":"Samuel Jones, T. Anthony, Sinan Sousan, Ralph W. Altmaier, Jae Hong Park, T. Peters","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/mew009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exposure to dust is a known occupational hazard in the swine industry, although efforts to measure exposures are labor intensive and costly. In this study, we evaluated a Dylos DC1100 as a low-cost (~$200) alternative to assess respirable dust concentrations in a swine building in winter. Dust concentrations were measured with collocated monitors (Dylos DC1100; an aerosol photometer, the pDR-1200; and a respirable sampler analyzed gravimetrically) placed in two locations within a swine farrowing building in winter for 18-24-h periods. The particle number concentrations measured with the DC1100 were converted to mass concentration using two methods: Physical Property Method and Regression Method. Raw number concentrations from the DC1100 were highly correlated to mass concentrations measured with the pDR-1200 with a coefficient of determination (R (2)) of 0.85, indicating that the two monitors respond similarly to respirable dust in this environment. Both methods of converting DC1100 number concentrations to mass concentrations yielded strong linear relationships relative to that measured with the pDR-1200 (Physical Property Method: slope = 1.03, R (2) = 0.72; Regression Method: slope = 0.72, R (2) = 0.73) and relative to that measured gravimetrically (Physical Property Method: slope = 1.08, R (2) = 0.64; Regression Method: slope = 0.75, R (2) = 0.62). The DC1100 can be used as a reasonable indicator of respirable mass concentrations within a CAFO and may have broader applicability to other agricultural and industrial settings.","PeriodicalId":342592,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","volume":"334 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mew009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Exposure to dust is a known occupational hazard in the swine industry, although efforts to measure exposures are labor intensive and costly. In this study, we evaluated a Dylos DC1100 as a low-cost (~$200) alternative to assess respirable dust concentrations in a swine building in winter. Dust concentrations were measured with collocated monitors (Dylos DC1100; an aerosol photometer, the pDR-1200; and a respirable sampler analyzed gravimetrically) placed in two locations within a swine farrowing building in winter for 18-24-h periods. The particle number concentrations measured with the DC1100 were converted to mass concentration using two methods: Physical Property Method and Regression Method. Raw number concentrations from the DC1100 were highly correlated to mass concentrations measured with the pDR-1200 with a coefficient of determination (R (2)) of 0.85, indicating that the two monitors respond similarly to respirable dust in this environment. Both methods of converting DC1100 number concentrations to mass concentrations yielded strong linear relationships relative to that measured with the pDR-1200 (Physical Property Method: slope = 1.03, R (2) = 0.72; Regression Method: slope = 0.72, R (2) = 0.73) and relative to that measured gravimetrically (Physical Property Method: slope = 1.08, R (2) = 0.64; Regression Method: slope = 0.75, R (2) = 0.62). The DC1100 can be used as a reasonable indicator of respirable mass concentrations within a CAFO and may have broader applicability to other agricultural and industrial settings.
低成本气溶胶传感器在猪舍粉尘浓度评估中的应用。
在养猪业中,暴露于粉尘是一种已知的职业危害,尽管测量暴露程度的努力是劳动密集型的,而且代价高昂。在这项研究中,我们评估了Dylos DC1100作为一种低成本(约200美元)的替代方案,用于评估冬季猪舍的呼吸性粉尘浓度。用配置监测仪测量粉尘浓度(Dylos DC1100;气溶胶光度计pDR-1200;并在冬季将可呼吸采样器放置在猪舍内的两个位置,为期18-24小时。采用物理性质法和回归法两种方法将DC1100测量的颗粒数浓度转换为质量浓度。DC1100的原始数字浓度与pDR-1200测量的质量浓度高度相关,决定系数(R(2))为0.85,表明这两个监测仪对该环境中的呼吸性粉尘的反应相似。将DC1100数浓度转换为质量浓度的两种方法与pDR-1200测量的结果都产生了很强的线性关系(物理性质法:斜率= 1.03,R (2) = 0.72;回归法:斜率= 0.72,R(2) = 0.73)和相对于重力测量值(物理性质法:斜率= 1.08,R (2) = 0.64;回归方法:斜率= 0.75,R(2) = 0.62。DC1100可作为CAFO内可吸入质量浓度的合理指标,可能对其他农业和工业环境具有更广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信