CAM documentation in clinical notes Towards an automated surveillance system for drug-herb interactions

Carlos Nakamura, Qing Zeng, L. A. Scarton
{"title":"CAM documentation in clinical notes Towards an automated surveillance system for drug-herb interactions","authors":"Carlos Nakamura, Qing Zeng, L. A. Scarton","doi":"10.1109/HEALTH.2011.6026736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herbal dietary supplements are the most popular form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapy — they are used by over 38 million US adults. However, treatments involving dietary supplements could potentially interact with prescription medications and have a negative impact on patient outcomes. Despite safety concerns, previous studies indicate that most patients do not discuss CAM use with their physicians. In this preliminary study we set out to: (1) conduct a computer assisted chart review of notes from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients to identify the documentation level of CAM use; and (2) investigate whether any herbal supplement in the resulting list is known to have a negative interaction with prescription drugs commonly taken by MS patients. The outcomes of this study will be used to inform the design of a system to collect CAM information from both patients and physician notes and issue alerts for potential negative interactions. Five percent of the analyzed notes contained descriptions of CAM use, 63% of which were Biologically-Based Practices. The notes containing actual mentions of CAM represent a small percentage when compared with the number reported by studies that obtained their data directly from patients. These numbers indicate that the use of CAM is indeed underreported in patient notes. Among the 19 types of herbs which use was positively identified, four had moderate interactions and one had minor interactions with commonly prescribed MS medications. Our findings suggest the need to collect more accurate data on CAM use in order to provide adequate surveillance of drug-herb interactions","PeriodicalId":187103,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HEALTH.2011.6026736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Herbal dietary supplements are the most popular form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapy — they are used by over 38 million US adults. However, treatments involving dietary supplements could potentially interact with prescription medications and have a negative impact on patient outcomes. Despite safety concerns, previous studies indicate that most patients do not discuss CAM use with their physicians. In this preliminary study we set out to: (1) conduct a computer assisted chart review of notes from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients to identify the documentation level of CAM use; and (2) investigate whether any herbal supplement in the resulting list is known to have a negative interaction with prescription drugs commonly taken by MS patients. The outcomes of this study will be used to inform the design of a system to collect CAM information from both patients and physician notes and issue alerts for potential negative interactions. Five percent of the analyzed notes contained descriptions of CAM use, 63% of which were Biologically-Based Practices. The notes containing actual mentions of CAM represent a small percentage when compared with the number reported by studies that obtained their data directly from patients. These numbers indicate that the use of CAM is indeed underreported in patient notes. Among the 19 types of herbs which use was positively identified, four had moderate interactions and one had minor interactions with commonly prescribed MS medications. Our findings suggest the need to collect more accurate data on CAM use in order to provide adequate surveillance of drug-herb interactions
临床记录中的CAM文件迈向药物-草药相互作用的自动监测系统
草药膳食补充剂是补充和替代医学(CAM)治疗中最受欢迎的形式——超过3800万美国成年人使用它们。然而,涉及膳食补充剂的治疗可能会与处方药相互作用,对患者的治疗结果产生负面影响。尽管存在安全问题,但先前的研究表明,大多数患者不会与医生讨论辅助替代疗法的使用。在这项初步研究中,我们着手:(1)对多发性硬化症(MS)患者的记录进行计算机辅助图表审查,以确定CAM使用的文件水平;(2)调查得出的清单中是否有已知的草药补充剂与MS患者常用的处方药有负相互作用。这项研究的结果将用于告知系统的设计,从患者和医生的笔记中收集CAM信息,并对潜在的负面互动发出警报。5%的分析记录包含CAM使用的描述,其中63%是基于生物学的实践。与直接从患者那里获得数据的研究报告的数量相比,实际提到CAM的笔记只占很小的比例。这些数字表明,在患者记录中,CAM的使用确实被低估了。在使用的19种草药中,有4种与常用的MS药物有中度相互作用,1种有轻微相互作用。我们的研究结果表明,需要收集更准确的数据,以CAM的使用,以提供充分的药物-草药相互作用的监测
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信