High incidence rate of human herpesvirus 6 infection after Bendamustine, Cytarabine, Etoposide and Melphalan conditioning regimen: A monocentric and retrospective study

S. Favre, M. Sauvezie, S. Vigouroux, R. Tabrizi, M. Dilhuydy, G. Labouré, M. Robles, N. Milpied, K. Bouabdallah
{"title":"High incidence rate of human herpesvirus 6 infection after Bendamustine, Cytarabine, Etoposide and Melphalan conditioning regimen: A monocentric and retrospective study","authors":"S. Favre, M. Sauvezie, S. Vigouroux, R. Tabrizi, M. Dilhuydy, G. Labouré, M. Robles, N. Milpied, K. Bouabdallah","doi":"10.17352/acn.000054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Following shortage of Carmustine, BeEAM regimen (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine and Melphalan) was used before autologous transplant in relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients. We evaluated safety and efficacy of BeEAM compared to BEAM. \nPatients and methods: Ninety consecutive patients receiving BeEAM (30pts) (Bendamustine 100, 120 or 200 mg/m²/d) or BEAM (60 pts) were retrospectively analyzed. \nResults: In the BEAM group, 68% had NHL and 32% HL compared to 87% and 13% in the BeEAM group (p = 0,014). Pts were in CR or PR at time of transplant. There was no difference regarding hematologic recovery and transfusion requirements. Highest dose of Bendamustine were associated with grade ≥ 2 kidney toxicity. We observed a significant higher incidence of symptomatic HHV-6 infection (53.3% versus 8.3%), digestive toxicity (36.6% versus 15%) and prolonged hospitalization (25 versus 21 days) with BeEAM. After a median follow up of 61 and 49 months for BEAM and BeEAM, 5y-OS and PFS (76% versus 67% and 56% versus 70%) and TRM (0% versus 3%) were not different. \nConclusions: BeEAM with the highest doses of Bendamustine was associated with increased risk of HHV-6 infection, longer duration of hospitalization, higher rate of digestive toxicity and increased acute kidney failure while survival was comparable.","PeriodicalId":127781,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Nephrology","volume":"246 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/acn.000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following shortage of Carmustine, BeEAM regimen (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine and Melphalan) was used before autologous transplant in relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients. We evaluated safety and efficacy of BeEAM compared to BEAM. Patients and methods: Ninety consecutive patients receiving BeEAM (30pts) (Bendamustine 100, 120 or 200 mg/m²/d) or BEAM (60 pts) were retrospectively analyzed. Results: In the BEAM group, 68% had NHL and 32% HL compared to 87% and 13% in the BeEAM group (p = 0,014). Pts were in CR or PR at time of transplant. There was no difference regarding hematologic recovery and transfusion requirements. Highest dose of Bendamustine were associated with grade ≥ 2 kidney toxicity. We observed a significant higher incidence of symptomatic HHV-6 infection (53.3% versus 8.3%), digestive toxicity (36.6% versus 15%) and prolonged hospitalization (25 versus 21 days) with BeEAM. After a median follow up of 61 and 49 months for BEAM and BeEAM, 5y-OS and PFS (76% versus 67% and 56% versus 70%) and TRM (0% versus 3%) were not different. Conclusions: BeEAM with the highest doses of Bendamustine was associated with increased risk of HHV-6 infection, longer duration of hospitalization, higher rate of digestive toxicity and increased acute kidney failure while survival was comparable.
苯达莫司汀、阿糖胞苷、依托泊苷和美法兰调节方案后人类疱疹病毒6型感染的高发生率:一项单中心和回顾性研究
背景:由于卡莫司汀短缺,复发/难治性淋巴瘤患者自体移植前采用beam方案(苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷和美法兰)。我们比较了BEAM与BEAM的安全性和有效性。患者和方法:回顾性分析90例连续接受BEAM(30例)(苯达莫司汀100、120或200 mg/m²/d)或BEAM(60例)治疗的患者。结果:在BEAM组中,68%的患者患有NHL, 32%的患者患有HL,而在BeEAM组中,这一比例分别为87%和13% (p = 0.014)。移植时患者处于CR或PR状态。在血液学恢复和输血要求方面没有差异。最高剂量苯达莫司汀与≥2级肾毒性相关。我们观察到beam的症状性HHV-6感染发生率(53.3%对8.3%)、消化毒性(36.6%对15%)和住院时间延长(25天对21天)显著增加。BEAM和BeEAM的中位随访时间分别为61个月和49个月,5y-OS和PFS(76%对67%,56%对70%)以及TRM(0%对3%)没有差异。结论:使用最高剂量苯达莫司汀的beam与HHV-6感染风险增加、住院时间延长、消化毒性发生率增加和急性肾衰竭发生率增加相关,但生存期相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信