Adequação das boas práticas em dois restaurantes do tipo fast-food no município de São Paulo, SP, Brasil

Marcia Lopes Weber, Aline Milan, Joyce de Paula Silva, Natália Marques Nogueira, Pâmela Rodrigues Da Silva
{"title":"Adequação das boas práticas em dois restaurantes do tipo fast-food no município de São Paulo, SP, Brasil","authors":"Marcia Lopes Weber, Aline Milan, Joyce de Paula Silva, Natália Marques Nogueira, Pâmela Rodrigues Da Silva","doi":"10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;3;19-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To identify the adequacy of good practices in two restaurants of two American fast-food franchises in the city of São Paulo, SP, Brazil. METHODS: A checklist adapted from the health legislation was used in each restaurant, identified as A and B, whose items were grouped into 5 blocks: Building and installation, Equipment, furniture and utensils, Handlers, Food production and transportation, and Documentation. The classification of the restaurants was based on the sanitary legislation: group 1, between 75 and 100% of conformities; group 2, between 51 and 74% of conformities; and group 3, from 0 to 50% of conformities. The general classification of the restaurants and by block of items was carried out. RESULTS:Restaurant A was classified in group 2 and B in group 1. Most of the non-conformities were observed in the blocks Documentation, Production and transport, and Manipulators for both restaurants; and Building and installation for restaurant A. CONCLUSION: Restaurant B had a higher percentage of conformities than restaurant A, and the classification was group 1 and 2, respectively. Regardless of the classification, both presented non-conformities relevant to the safety of the food produced. Based on that, it is suggested to apply an action plan to adapt to the current legislation, guaranteeing quality to food and health to consumers.","PeriodicalId":285800,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;3;19-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the adequacy of good practices in two restaurants of two American fast-food franchises in the city of São Paulo, SP, Brazil. METHODS: A checklist adapted from the health legislation was used in each restaurant, identified as A and B, whose items were grouped into 5 blocks: Building and installation, Equipment, furniture and utensils, Handlers, Food production and transportation, and Documentation. The classification of the restaurants was based on the sanitary legislation: group 1, between 75 and 100% of conformities; group 2, between 51 and 74% of conformities; and group 3, from 0 to 50% of conformities. The general classification of the restaurants and by block of items was carried out. RESULTS:Restaurant A was classified in group 2 and B in group 1. Most of the non-conformities were observed in the blocks Documentation, Production and transport, and Manipulators for both restaurants; and Building and installation for restaurant A. CONCLUSION: Restaurant B had a higher percentage of conformities than restaurant A, and the classification was group 1 and 2, respectively. Regardless of the classification, both presented non-conformities relevant to the safety of the food produced. Based on that, it is suggested to apply an action plan to adapt to the current legislation, guaranteeing quality to food and health to consumers.
在sao Paulo, SP,巴西的两家快餐店的良好做法的充分性
目的:确定在圣保罗市,SP,巴西的两个美国快餐特许经营的两个餐馆的良好做法的充分性。方法:在每个餐厅使用一份根据卫生法规改编的清单,确定为A和B,其项目分为5个部分:建筑和安装,设备,家具和器具,操作人员,食品生产和运输以及文件。根据卫生法规对餐厅进行分类:第一类,合格率在75%到100%之间;第2组,符合度在51 - 74%之间;第三组,从0到50%的符合度。对餐厅进行了总体分类,并按项目块进行了分类。结果:A餐厅归为第2组,B餐厅归为第1组。大部分不符合项是在两个餐厅的文件、生产和运输以及操作部门中发现的;结论:B餐厅的合格率高于a餐厅,分别属于第1类和第2类。无论分类如何,两者都提出了与所生产食品安全相关的不符合项。在此基础上,建议制定适应现行立法的行动计划,保障食品质量,保障消费者健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信