{"title":"Stock Return Asymmetry in China","authors":"Ke Wu, Yifeng Zhu, Dongxu Chen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3724761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we find that the upside asymmetry calculated based on a new distribution-based asymmetry measure proposed by Jiang, Wu, Zhou, and Zhu (2020) is negatively related to average future returns in the crosssection of Chinese stock returns. By contrast, when using a conventional skewness measure, the relationship between asymmetry and average returns is unclear. Furthermore, the asymmetry factor constructed from the new asymmetry measure cannot be explained by the three-factor (CH-3) and four-factor (CH-4) models proposed by Liu, Stambaugh, and Yuan (2019). When augmenting the CH-3 model with our asymmetry factor, the new four-factor \nmodel is able to explain 33 anomalies out of a universe of 37 significant anomalies in the Chinese stock market.","PeriodicalId":130177,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
In this paper, we find that the upside asymmetry calculated based on a new distribution-based asymmetry measure proposed by Jiang, Wu, Zhou, and Zhu (2020) is negatively related to average future returns in the crosssection of Chinese stock returns. By contrast, when using a conventional skewness measure, the relationship between asymmetry and average returns is unclear. Furthermore, the asymmetry factor constructed from the new asymmetry measure cannot be explained by the three-factor (CH-3) and four-factor (CH-4) models proposed by Liu, Stambaugh, and Yuan (2019). When augmenting the CH-3 model with our asymmetry factor, the new four-factor
model is able to explain 33 anomalies out of a universe of 37 significant anomalies in the Chinese stock market.