The Future of Desa Pancasila as Indigenous Knowledge: Comparative Study of Balun Village in Lamongan and Nogosari Hamlet in Bantul

Fitri Alfariz, Rr. Yudiswara Ayu
{"title":"The Future of Desa Pancasila as Indigenous Knowledge: Comparative Study of Balun Village in Lamongan and Nogosari Hamlet in Bantul","authors":"Fitri Alfariz, Rr. Yudiswara Ayu","doi":"10.29037/digitalpress.49439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pancasila as a state ideology needs to continue to be \nactualized. One way to actualize it is to make the village one of the practical \nspaces. Villages are also an implication for the space for indigenous knowledge \nto occur. the two pancasila villages used as research objects are Balun village \nand Nogosari hamlet. Both of them have their own character and background as \nPancasila Village. The character in each village provides sharpening of the \ncharacter of Pancasila village as indigenous knowledge trough the worldviews. \nTherefore, this study aims to make the findings as a future concept for \nPancasila Village. The purpose is based on the position of Pancasila Village as \nIndigineous Knowledge. The method used is a field study, namely in balun \nvillage, Lamongan, east java and Nogosari hamlet, Bantul, Yogyakarta. Data \ncollection methods are interviews, observations, and libraries. The result \nobtained is that the ideal concept of pancasila village based on indigenous \nknowledge is to pay more attention to the relationship between individual \nknowledge and the social and environment. Focusing on the relationship of \nsocial cognition can provide optimization to the preservation of the \noriginality of knowledge that exists in the community and the regulation of the \ndirection of development of Pancasila Village.","PeriodicalId":270635,"journal":{"name":"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.49439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pancasila as a state ideology needs to continue to be actualized. One way to actualize it is to make the village one of the practical spaces. Villages are also an implication for the space for indigenous knowledge to occur. the two pancasila villages used as research objects are Balun village and Nogosari hamlet. Both of them have their own character and background as Pancasila Village. The character in each village provides sharpening of the character of Pancasila village as indigenous knowledge trough the worldviews. Therefore, this study aims to make the findings as a future concept for Pancasila Village. The purpose is based on the position of Pancasila Village as Indigineous Knowledge. The method used is a field study, namely in balun village, Lamongan, east java and Nogosari hamlet, Bantul, Yogyakarta. Data collection methods are interviews, observations, and libraries. The result obtained is that the ideal concept of pancasila village based on indigenous knowledge is to pay more attention to the relationship between individual knowledge and the social and environment. Focusing on the relationship of social cognition can provide optimization to the preservation of the originality of knowledge that exists in the community and the regulation of the direction of development of Pancasila Village.
Desa Pancasila作为本土知识的未来:拉蒙干Balun村与班图尔Nogosari村的比较研究
潘卡西拉作为一种国家意识形态需要继续实现。实现这一目标的途径之一是使村庄成为实践空间之一。村庄也隐含着本土知识发生的空间。作为研究对象的两个pancasila村是Balun村和Nogosari村。它们都有自己的特点和潘卡西拉村的背景。每个村庄的特征通过世界观提供了潘卡西拉村作为土著知识的特征的锐化。因此,本研究旨在将研究结果作为Pancasila村未来的概念。其目的是基于潘卡西拉村作为土著知识的地位。所使用的方法是实地研究,即在东爪哇拉蒙根的balun村和日惹班图尔的Nogosari村。数据收集方法有访谈、观察和图书馆。研究结果表明,基于土著知识的潘卡西拉村的理想理念是更加关注个体知识与社会和环境的关系。关注社会认知的关系,可以优化社区中存在的知识原创性的保存,调节潘卡西拉村的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信