M. Alkhodari, G. Apostolidis, Charilaos A. Zisou, L. Hadjileontiadis, A. Khandoker
{"title":"Swarm Decomposition Enhances the Discrimination of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Varied-Lead ECG Using ResNet-BiLSTM Network Activations","authors":"M. Alkhodari, G. Apostolidis, Charilaos A. Zisou, L. Hadjileontiadis, A. Khandoker","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard screening tool for cardiac arrhythmias remains to be the 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). Despite carrying rich information about different types of arrhythmias, it is considered bulky, high-cost, and often hard to use. In this study, we sought to investigate the efficiency of using 6-lead, 4-lead, 3 -lead, and 2-lead ECG in discriminating between 26 arrhythmia types and compare them with the standard 12-lead ECG. as part of PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology 2021 Challenge. Our team, Care4MyHeart, developed a deep learning approach based on residual convolutional neural networks and Bi-directional long short term memory (ResNet-BiLSTM) to extract deep-activated features from ECG oscillatory components obtained using a novel swarm decomposition (SWD) algorithm. Alongside age and sex, these automated features were combined with hand-crafted features from heart rate variability and SWD components for training and classification. Our approach achieved a challenge score of 0.45, 0.43, 0.44, 0.43, and 0.42 using 10-fold cross-validation using the training set and 0.25, 0.23, 0.24, 0.22, and 0.20 using the hidden test set for 12-lead, 6-lead, 4-lead, 3-lead, and 2-lead, respectively. Our team was ranked the 31/38 with an average all-lead test score of 0.22.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The standard screening tool for cardiac arrhythmias remains to be the 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). Despite carrying rich information about different types of arrhythmias, it is considered bulky, high-cost, and often hard to use. In this study, we sought to investigate the efficiency of using 6-lead, 4-lead, 3 -lead, and 2-lead ECG in discriminating between 26 arrhythmia types and compare them with the standard 12-lead ECG. as part of PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology 2021 Challenge. Our team, Care4MyHeart, developed a deep learning approach based on residual convolutional neural networks and Bi-directional long short term memory (ResNet-BiLSTM) to extract deep-activated features from ECG oscillatory components obtained using a novel swarm decomposition (SWD) algorithm. Alongside age and sex, these automated features were combined with hand-crafted features from heart rate variability and SWD components for training and classification. Our approach achieved a challenge score of 0.45, 0.43, 0.44, 0.43, and 0.42 using 10-fold cross-validation using the training set and 0.25, 0.23, 0.24, 0.22, and 0.20 using the hidden test set for 12-lead, 6-lead, 4-lead, 3-lead, and 2-lead, respectively. Our team was ranked the 31/38 with an average all-lead test score of 0.22.
心律失常的标准筛查工具仍然是12导联心电图(ECG)。尽管携带了关于不同类型心律失常的丰富信息,但它被认为体积庞大,成本高,而且通常难以使用。在这项研究中,我们试图探讨使用6导联、4导联、3导联和2导联心电图区分26种心律失常类型的效率,并将其与标准12导联心电图进行比较。作为PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology 2021挑战赛的一部分。我们的团队Care4MyHeart开发了一种基于残差卷积神经网络和双向长短期记忆(ResNet-BiLSTM)的深度学习方法,从使用新型群分解(SWD)算法获得的ECG振荡分量中提取深度激活特征。除了年龄和性别之外,这些自动特征还与心率变异性和SWD组件的手工特征相结合,用于训练和分类。我们的方法使用训练集进行10倍交叉验证,获得了0.45、0.43、0.44、0.43和0.42的挑战得分,使用隐藏测试集分别为0.25、0.23、0.24、0.22和0.20,分别为12导联、6导联、4导联、3导联和2导联。我们队全铅测试平均成绩为0.22,排名第31/38。