EVALUATE PLANT GROWTH, GREEN POD YIELD AND ITS QUALITY OF THE TWO PEA CULTIVARS ENTSAR 1 AND MASTER B WITH DIFFERENT PLANT DENSITIES

Wafaa, A. Fekry, S. El-Shatoury
{"title":"EVALUATE PLANT GROWTH, GREEN POD YIELD AND ITS QUALITY OF THE TWO PEA CULTIVARS ENTSAR 1 AND MASTER B WITH DIFFERENT PLANT DENSITIES","authors":"Wafaa, A. Fekry, S. El-Shatoury","doi":"10.21608/jpd.2019.42118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work was carried out during the two winter seasons of 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 at the Experimental Farm(Ghazala-Zagazig), to evaluate the new pea cultivars Entsar 1 under the three rates of plant densities, i.e. 40, 50 and 60 plant m -2 compared with the traditional variety Master B on plant growth, total green pod yield and its quality. The obtained results showed that : The two pea cultivars had significant differences in most studied characters. Entsar 1 cv. had the best results of most vegetative growth characters, i.e. plant length, number of leaves, fresh and dry weight plant -1 , as well as the total chlorophyll content of pea leaves. Moreover, it had the maximum total green pod yield per feddan with high pod quality (pod length, diameter, number of seeds as well as fresh weight of pod and its green seed) and 1000-seed fresh and dry weight. Meanwhile, the cv. Master B recorded the highest value of plant length only. From that, the cultivar Entsar 1 with plant density 40 plant m -2 had the best plant growth and higher characters quality of the green pods, whereas the density 60 plant m -2 for the highest total green pod yield may be suggested for the winter green pea. under .","PeriodicalId":184675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Productivity and Development","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Productivity and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jpd.2019.42118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work was carried out during the two winter seasons of 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 at the Experimental Farm(Ghazala-Zagazig), to evaluate the new pea cultivars Entsar 1 under the three rates of plant densities, i.e. 40, 50 and 60 plant m -2 compared with the traditional variety Master B on plant growth, total green pod yield and its quality. The obtained results showed that : The two pea cultivars had significant differences in most studied characters. Entsar 1 cv. had the best results of most vegetative growth characters, i.e. plant length, number of leaves, fresh and dry weight plant -1 , as well as the total chlorophyll content of pea leaves. Moreover, it had the maximum total green pod yield per feddan with high pod quality (pod length, diameter, number of seeds as well as fresh weight of pod and its green seed) and 1000-seed fresh and dry weight. Meanwhile, the cv. Master B recorded the highest value of plant length only. From that, the cultivar Entsar 1 with plant density 40 plant m -2 had the best plant growth and higher characters quality of the green pods, whereas the density 60 plant m -2 for the highest total green pod yield may be suggested for the winter green pea. under .
评价不同种植密度下豌豆品种entsar 1和master b的植株生长、绿荚产量及其品质
本研究于2014/2015和2015/2016两个冬季在实验农场(Ghazala-Zagazig)进行,评价了豌豆新品种Entsar 1在40、50和60株m -2 3种密度下与传统品种Master B在植株生长、总绿荚产量和品质上的差异。结果表明:2个豌豆品种在大部分研究性状上存在显著差异。Entsar 1 cv。在豌豆植株长度、叶片数、鲜重和干重-1、叶片总叶绿素含量等大部分营养生长性状上均取得最佳效果。单季绿荚产量最高,荚果品质(荚果长、直径、种子数、荚果及其绿籽鲜重)高,鲜干重达1000粒。同时,简历。Master B只记录到了植株长度的最大值。由此可见,栽培密度为40株m -2的恩沙1株型生长最佳,青荚性状质量较高,而栽培密度为60株m -2的青荚总产量最高。下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信