Model checking SystemC designs using timed automata

Paula Herber, Joachim Fellmuth, S. Glesner
{"title":"Model checking SystemC designs using timed automata","authors":"Paula Herber, Joachim Fellmuth, S. Glesner","doi":"10.1145/1450135.1450166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SystemC is widely used for modeling and simulation in hardware/software co-design. Due to the lack of a complete formal semantics, it is not possible to verify SystemC designs. In this paper, we present an approach to overcome this problem by defining the semantics of SystemC by a mapping from SystemC designs into the well-defined semantics of Uppaal timed automata. The informally defined behavior and the structure of SystemC designs are completely preserved in the generated Uppaal models. The resulting Uppaal models allow us to use the Uppaal model checker and the Uppaal tool suite, including simulation and visualization tools. The model checker can be used to verify important properties such as liveness, deadlock freedom or compliance with timing constraints. We have implemented the presented transformation, applied it to two examples and verified liveness, safety and timing properties by model checking, thus showing the applicability of our approach in practice.","PeriodicalId":300268,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"99","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1450135.1450166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 99

Abstract

SystemC is widely used for modeling and simulation in hardware/software co-design. Due to the lack of a complete formal semantics, it is not possible to verify SystemC designs. In this paper, we present an approach to overcome this problem by defining the semantics of SystemC by a mapping from SystemC designs into the well-defined semantics of Uppaal timed automata. The informally defined behavior and the structure of SystemC designs are completely preserved in the generated Uppaal models. The resulting Uppaal models allow us to use the Uppaal model checker and the Uppaal tool suite, including simulation and visualization tools. The model checker can be used to verify important properties such as liveness, deadlock freedom or compliance with timing constraints. We have implemented the presented transformation, applied it to two examples and verified liveness, safety and timing properties by model checking, thus showing the applicability of our approach in practice.
使用时间自动机的系统设计
SystemC广泛用于软硬件协同设计中的建模和仿真。由于缺乏完整的形式化语义,验证SystemC设计是不可能的。在本文中,我们提出了一种克服这一问题的方法,即通过将SystemC设计映射到定义良好的Uppaal时间自动机语义来定义SystemC的语义。非正式定义的行为和SystemC设计的结构完全保留在生成的Uppaal模型中。得到的Uppaal模型允许我们使用Uppaal模型检查器和Uppaal工具套件,包括仿真和可视化工具。模型检查器可用于验证重要的属性,如活动性、死锁自由度或对时间约束的遵从性。我们对所提出的变换进行了实现,并将其应用到两个实例中,通过模型检验验证了该方法的活动性、安全性和时序性,从而表明了该方法在实践中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信