The Poetics of the Unconscious in The Idiot and Hegel’s Subject of Philosophical History

S. Vladiv-Glover
{"title":"The Poetics of the Unconscious in The Idiot and Hegel’s Subject of Philosophical History","authors":"S. Vladiv-Glover","doi":"10.1163/23752122-02401001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe present paper reads The Idiot in the context of Hegel’s philosophy of history and subjectivity and finds that Dostoevsky’s avowed interest in Hegel led to a substantial absorption of Hegel’s thought in his own aesthetics.\nDostoevsky’s educated readers of the 1860s saw the novel as a moral history of the age, represented through an eccentric « new subject » (or the « new people »), embodied in marionette-like characters. The present paper explores this view further and finds that these marionette-like characters function as agents of the unconscious (and pre-empt the aesthetics of the theatre of the Absurd), which is the source of all subjectivity. Expressivity is the defining feature of subjectivity and is represented by means of pathological states – lying and self-destructive tendencies of the characters who display a pathological demeanour. Caprice (will power) is the prime mover of this subjectivity, which, in the context of Hegel’s philosophy of history, is the driver of the historical process and a direct expression of « Geist » or spirit of the people. This spirit comes to expression in different types of Russian national discourses, embodied in the myriad of embedded stories narrated by the characters on stage and off stage, and in stories within stories of episodic characters. These embedded episodic narratives, consisting of verbal pictures (or ekphrases), tell the story of Russia’s historical development from Peter Great’s time to Dostoevsky’s present of the 1860s. This is the story of the demise of the old « estate culture » of traditional Russia, with a « new Russia » emerging into history, which is grounded in an indeterminate subject of history, whose « pochva » (« soil ») is the groundless ground of language and an ethics of individual freedom. Both of these elements of subjectivity, which define the « new people », are negativities shaping a new dialectics, which is both form and content of the new self-conscious “world-historical individual” – Hegelian Man - through which spirit (Geist) manifests itself in the “present moment” of Dostoevsky’s Russia.","PeriodicalId":125221,"journal":{"name":"The Dostoevsky Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Dostoevsky Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23752122-02401001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present paper reads The Idiot in the context of Hegel’s philosophy of history and subjectivity and finds that Dostoevsky’s avowed interest in Hegel led to a substantial absorption of Hegel’s thought in his own aesthetics. Dostoevsky’s educated readers of the 1860s saw the novel as a moral history of the age, represented through an eccentric « new subject » (or the « new people »), embodied in marionette-like characters. The present paper explores this view further and finds that these marionette-like characters function as agents of the unconscious (and pre-empt the aesthetics of the theatre of the Absurd), which is the source of all subjectivity. Expressivity is the defining feature of subjectivity and is represented by means of pathological states – lying and self-destructive tendencies of the characters who display a pathological demeanour. Caprice (will power) is the prime mover of this subjectivity, which, in the context of Hegel’s philosophy of history, is the driver of the historical process and a direct expression of « Geist » or spirit of the people. This spirit comes to expression in different types of Russian national discourses, embodied in the myriad of embedded stories narrated by the characters on stage and off stage, and in stories within stories of episodic characters. These embedded episodic narratives, consisting of verbal pictures (or ekphrases), tell the story of Russia’s historical development from Peter Great’s time to Dostoevsky’s present of the 1860s. This is the story of the demise of the old « estate culture » of traditional Russia, with a « new Russia » emerging into history, which is grounded in an indeterminate subject of history, whose « pochva » (« soil ») is the groundless ground of language and an ethics of individual freedom. Both of these elements of subjectivity, which define the « new people », are negativities shaping a new dialectics, which is both form and content of the new self-conscious “world-historical individual” – Hegelian Man - through which spirit (Geist) manifests itself in the “present moment” of Dostoevsky’s Russia.
《白痴》中的无意识诗学与黑格尔的哲学史主体
本文将《白痴》放在黑格尔的历史哲学和主体性哲学的语境中来解读,发现陀思妥耶夫斯基对黑格尔的公开兴趣导致他在自己的美学中大量吸收了黑格尔的思想。19世纪60年代,陀思妥耶夫斯基受过教育的读者把这部小说看作是一个时代的道德史,通过一个古怪的“新主体”(或“新人物”)来表现,体现在木偶般的人物身上。本文进一步探讨了这一观点,并发现这些木偶般的角色是无意识的代理人(并且先发制人的荒谬戏剧美学),这是所有主观性的来源。表现性是主体性的决定性特征,表现为表现出病态行为的人物的病态状态——说谎和自我毁灭倾向。任性(意志力)是这种主体性的原动力,在黑格尔的历史哲学背景下,主体性是历史进程的驱动力,是“精神”或人民精神的直接表达。这种精神表现在不同类型的俄罗斯民族话语中,体现在舞台上和舞台下的人物讲述的无数嵌入故事中,以及情节人物的故事中的故事中。这些嵌入的情节叙事,由文字图片(或短语)组成,讲述了俄罗斯从彼得大帝时代到陀思妥耶夫斯基所处的19世纪60年代的历史发展故事。这是一个关于传统俄罗斯旧的“阶级文化”消亡的故事,一个“新俄罗斯”出现在历史中,它建立在一个不确定的历史主体之上,其“pochva”(“土壤”)是语言和个人自由伦理的无根据基础。这两个定义“新人”的主体性要素都是否定性的,它们塑造了一种新的辩证法,这种辩证法既是新自觉的“世界历史个体”——黑格尔式的人——的形式,也是内容,通过这种辩证法,精神(Geist)在陀思妥耶夫斯基的俄罗斯的“当下时刻”表现出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书