Brittle Features of Device Authentication

Washington Garcia, Animesh Chhotaray, Joseph I. Choi, Suman Kalyan Adari, Kevin R. B. Butler, S. Jha
{"title":"Brittle Features of Device Authentication","authors":"Washington Garcia, Animesh Chhotaray, Joseph I. Choi, Suman Kalyan Adari, Kevin R. B. Butler, S. Jha","doi":"10.1145/3422337.3447842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authenticating a networked device relies on identifying its unique characteristics. Recent device fingerprinting proposals demonstrate that device activity, such as network traffic, can be used to extract features which identify devices using machine learning (ML). However, there has been little work examining how adversarial machine learning can compromise these schemes. In this work, we show two efficient attacks against three ML-based device authentication (MDA) systems. One of the attacks is an adaptation of an existing gradient-estimation-based attack to the MDA setting; the second uses a fuzzing-based approach. We find that the MDA systems use brittle features for device identification and hence, can be reliably fooled with only 30 to 80 failed authentication attempts. However, selecting features that are robust against adversarial attack is challenging, as indicators such as information gain are not reflective of the features that adversaries most profitably attack. We demonstrate that it is possible to defend MDA systems which rely on neural networks, and in the general case, offer targeted advice for designing more robust MDA systems.","PeriodicalId":187272,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3422337.3447842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Authenticating a networked device relies on identifying its unique characteristics. Recent device fingerprinting proposals demonstrate that device activity, such as network traffic, can be used to extract features which identify devices using machine learning (ML). However, there has been little work examining how adversarial machine learning can compromise these schemes. In this work, we show two efficient attacks against three ML-based device authentication (MDA) systems. One of the attacks is an adaptation of an existing gradient-estimation-based attack to the MDA setting; the second uses a fuzzing-based approach. We find that the MDA systems use brittle features for device identification and hence, can be reliably fooled with only 30 to 80 failed authentication attempts. However, selecting features that are robust against adversarial attack is challenging, as indicators such as information gain are not reflective of the features that adversaries most profitably attack. We demonstrate that it is possible to defend MDA systems which rely on neural networks, and in the general case, offer targeted advice for designing more robust MDA systems.
设备认证的脆性特征
对联网设备进行身份验证依赖于识别其唯一特征。最近的设备指纹提案表明,设备活动(如网络流量)可用于提取使用机器学习(ML)识别设备的特征。然而,很少有研究对抗性机器学习如何破坏这些方案的工作。在这项工作中,我们展示了针对三种基于机器学习的设备身份验证(MDA)系统的两种有效攻击。其中一种攻击是对现有的基于梯度估计的攻击进行MDA设置的调整;第二种方法使用基于模糊的方法。我们发现MDA系统使用脆弱的特征进行设备识别,因此,只需30到80次失败的身份验证尝试就可以可靠地欺骗。然而,选择对对抗性攻击具有鲁棒性的特征是具有挑战性的,因为信息增益等指标并不能反映攻击者最有利的攻击特征。我们证明了防御依赖于神经网络的MDA系统是可能的,并且在一般情况下,为设计更健壮的MDA系统提供了有针对性的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信