К вопросу о раскладке окладных сборов у калмыков в XIX в. (на примере южной части Малодербетовского улуса в 1882 г.)

Evgeny N. Ubushaev, Olga N. Abeeva, Vyacheslav N. Avliev, Narma A. Kamandzhaev
{"title":"К вопросу о раскладке окладных сборов у калмыков в XIX в. (на примере южной части Малодербетовского улуса в 1882 г.)","authors":"Evgeny N. Ubushaev, Olga N. Abeeva, Vyacheslav N. Avliev, Narma A. Kamandzhaev","doi":"10.22162/2619-0990-2021-53-1-33-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article analyzes tax apportionment for Kalmyk population in the 19th century through examining aimak-level (Kalm. ‘locality, settlement’) data. Goals. The study mainly aims at identification of categories of taxes adopted at the aimak level, determination of the tax apportionment mechanism, analysis of average amounts of taxes across different aimaks. Materials. The analyzed documents include reports of 1882 on taxes from southern aimaks of Baga Dorbet (Russ. Maloderbetovsky) Ulus housed by the National Archive of the Kalmykia (Coll. И-15). Results. Apportionment, i.e. a financial method which assumes distribution of the total amount of a certain type of income for a set of taxable objects, was officially adopted by Kalmyks in the second half of the 19th century. The materials show the form in which it was used by the Kalmyks on the eve of the obligatory relationships’ cancellation, i.e. in the 1880s. Kalmyk commoners paid both official and non-official taxes — in terms of the Regulations introduced by the Imperial Court for the Kalmyk People’s Directorate. The non-official ones included ‘dark’ and household fees, as well as a ‘public needs’ fee, which, in our view, went to ulus-level budgets. The period under study witnessed the application of the apportionment principle (guideline) to the entire amount of taxes. Aimak meetings decided which families would not pay taxes to further divide the entire amount into two parts: the first one was apportioned for a certain number of heads of cattle, while the other was paid by each truly dutiable family at a rate set by the meeting. There was a rather tangible difference between aimaks in the average values of taxes per family. This indicator depended mainly on the share of tax-exempt families and the specific value of ‘unofficial’ taxes in the aimak.","PeriodicalId":434355,"journal":{"name":"The Oriental studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oriental studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2021-53-1-33-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article analyzes tax apportionment for Kalmyk population in the 19th century through examining aimak-level (Kalm. ‘locality, settlement’) data. Goals. The study mainly aims at identification of categories of taxes adopted at the aimak level, determination of the tax apportionment mechanism, analysis of average amounts of taxes across different aimaks. Materials. The analyzed documents include reports of 1882 on taxes from southern aimaks of Baga Dorbet (Russ. Maloderbetovsky) Ulus housed by the National Archive of the Kalmykia (Coll. И-15). Results. Apportionment, i.e. a financial method which assumes distribution of the total amount of a certain type of income for a set of taxable objects, was officially adopted by Kalmyks in the second half of the 19th century. The materials show the form in which it was used by the Kalmyks on the eve of the obligatory relationships’ cancellation, i.e. in the 1880s. Kalmyk commoners paid both official and non-official taxes — in terms of the Regulations introduced by the Imperial Court for the Kalmyk People’s Directorate. The non-official ones included ‘dark’ and household fees, as well as a ‘public needs’ fee, which, in our view, went to ulus-level budgets. The period under study witnessed the application of the apportionment principle (guideline) to the entire amount of taxes. Aimak meetings decided which families would not pay taxes to further divide the entire amount into two parts: the first one was apportioned for a certain number of heads of cattle, while the other was paid by each truly dutiable family at a rate set by the meeting. There was a rather tangible difference between aimaks in the average values of taxes per family. This indicator depended mainly on the share of tax-exempt families and the specific value of ‘unofficial’ taxes in the aimak.
介绍。本文通过对卡尔梅克地区的考察,分析了19世纪卡尔梅克人的税收分配情况。'地点,定居点')数据。的目标。研究的主要目的是确定目标层面所采用的税种,确定税收分配机制,分析不同目标的平均税额。材料。所分析的文件包括1882年关于巴加多贝特(俄罗斯)南部地区税收的报告。马洛德别托夫斯基)乌勒斯由卡尔梅克国家档案馆(科尔。И-15)。结果。分摊税是一种财政方法,它假定将某种收入的总额分配给一系列应税对象,这种方法在19世纪下半叶被卡尔梅克人正式采用。这些材料显示了卡尔梅克人在义务关系取消前夕(即19世纪80年代)使用它的形式。卡尔梅克平民根据帝国法院为卡尔梅克人民理事会制定的条例缴纳官方和非官方的税款。非官方的费用包括“黑暗”和家庭费用,以及“公共需求”费用,在我们看来,这些费用属于政府预算。在本报告所述期间,分摊原则(准则)适用于全部税款。Aimak会议决定哪些家庭不纳税,并进一步将整个金额分成两部分:第一部分是为一定数量的牛分配的,而另一部分则由每个真正应纳税的家庭按会议确定的税率支付。两国在每个家庭的平均税收上存在相当明显的差异。这一指标主要取决于免税家庭的比例和aimak中“非官方”税收的具体价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信