Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe in Anie and Others v. Italy – End of the Road for intra-EU ECT Arbitration?

Auriane Negret
{"title":"Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe in Anie and Others v. Italy – End of the Road for intra-EU ECT Arbitration?","authors":"Auriane Negret","doi":"10.1163/24689017_0601012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 29 October 2020, Court of Justice of the European Union (cjeu) Advocate General (ag) Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered his opinion on Joined Cases C- 798/ 18 and C- 799/ 18 regarding the compatibility of Italian measures reducing incentives in the renewable energy sector with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter) and the Energy Charter Treaty (the ect). These cases emerged from two questions referred by the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio, Italy to the cjeu. In his opinion, the ag suggests that the Italian measures are compatible with both the Charter and the ect and recommends that the cjeu issue a preliminary ruling to that effect. In a noteworthy footnote, the ag also expresses his opinion on the consequences of the 2018 Achmea decision for ect arbitration between EU Member States (intra- eu ect arbitration). This case note recalls and comments on the arguments of the ag, with a focus on its significance in the debate on the future of intra- EU investment disputes based on the ect.","PeriodicalId":164842,"journal":{"name":"European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24689017_0601012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 29 October 2020, Court of Justice of the European Union (cjeu) Advocate General (ag) Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered his opinion on Joined Cases C- 798/ 18 and C- 799/ 18 regarding the compatibility of Italian measures reducing incentives in the renewable energy sector with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter) and the Energy Charter Treaty (the ect). These cases emerged from two questions referred by the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio, Italy to the cjeu. In his opinion, the ag suggests that the Italian measures are compatible with both the Charter and the ect and recommends that the cjeu issue a preliminary ruling to that effect. In a noteworthy footnote, the ag also expresses his opinion on the consequences of the 2018 Achmea decision for ect arbitration between EU Member States (intra- eu ect arbitration). This case note recalls and comments on the arguments of the ag, with a focus on its significance in the debate on the future of intra- EU investment disputes based on the ect.
律师Saugmandsgaard Øe在Anie等人诉意大利案中的意见-欧盟内部ECT仲裁之路已走到尽头?
2020年10月29日,欧洲联盟法院总检察长Saugmandsgaard Øe就联合案件C- 798/ 18和C- 799/ 18发表了意见,该案涉及意大利减少可再生能源部门激励措施与《欧盟基本权利宪章》(《宪章》)和《能源宪章条约》(《等》)的兼容性。这些案件是由意大利拉齐奥地区行政法院提交欧洲法院的两个问题引起的。他认为,法官认为意大利的措施既符合《宪章》,也符合国际法,并建议法院就此作出初步裁决。在一个值得注意的脚注中,检察长还表达了他对2018年阿赫迈亚决定在欧盟成员国之间进行有效仲裁(欧盟内部仲裁)的后果的看法。本案例说明回顾并评论了该协定的论点,重点关注其在未来基于该协定的欧盟内部投资争端辩论中的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信