Livestock Export from Adama Quarantine Stations: Comparing Management and Biosecurity of Feedlots before Live Animal Export, DireDawa, Ethiopia

J. Shiferaw
{"title":"Livestock Export from Adama Quarantine Stations: Comparing Management and Biosecurity of Feedlots before Live Animal Export, DireDawa, Ethiopia","authors":"J. Shiferaw","doi":"10.7176/alst/83-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to characterize and identify husbandry practice and major constraints of feedlot industries in Adama quarantine area. Three feedlot farms were used to collect data to compare management and biosecurity of each feedlot and determine the impact of improper animal handling on animal export from Ethiopia. Questionnaire data collected was coded and entered in to Microsoft Excel spread sheet and was analyzed by using SPSS version 16.0 software. Questionnaire survey has been conducted on 40 of the quarantine workers which include the management team, veterinarian in charge and daily laborers. Among the total of 40 people 62.5% (25/40) answers the animal injured found in the quarantine whether they are due to transportation or incomplete management found in the feedlot. When we see the number of died animals in each quarantine stations it is quite different in number. For example, in Koshe and Wanji quarantine stations the number of died animals are 11(2.2%) and 12(0.75%) respectively but the number died animals in both quarantine stations were significantly different when comparing by their number of animals found in the farm. According to the respondents and statistical evaluation rate the biosecurity in three feedlots scarcity or totally absent of feedlot requirements  leads diseases to cattle which in turn constraint the live animal export and decrease the requirement of Ethiopia’s livestock in import countries. As statistical evaluation shows the percentage of injury, no isolation of new arrival and sick animals, feed disorder, improper storage of feed, problems in the farm including scarcity of materials, absence of vaccination and  contact of species of animals that were not the member of the species those in feedlot were significant reason in study area. Individually all person should take responsibility to present quality livestock for export requirement. Keywords: Adama, feedlot, livestock export, management and biosecurity, quarantine, questionnaire survey, Ethiopia DOI: 10.7176/ALST/83-04 Publication date: November 30 th 2020","PeriodicalId":137891,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Life Science and Technology","volume":"45 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Life Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/alst/83-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to characterize and identify husbandry practice and major constraints of feedlot industries in Adama quarantine area. Three feedlot farms were used to collect data to compare management and biosecurity of each feedlot and determine the impact of improper animal handling on animal export from Ethiopia. Questionnaire data collected was coded and entered in to Microsoft Excel spread sheet and was analyzed by using SPSS version 16.0 software. Questionnaire survey has been conducted on 40 of the quarantine workers which include the management team, veterinarian in charge and daily laborers. Among the total of 40 people 62.5% (25/40) answers the animal injured found in the quarantine whether they are due to transportation or incomplete management found in the feedlot. When we see the number of died animals in each quarantine stations it is quite different in number. For example, in Koshe and Wanji quarantine stations the number of died animals are 11(2.2%) and 12(0.75%) respectively but the number died animals in both quarantine stations were significantly different when comparing by their number of animals found in the farm. According to the respondents and statistical evaluation rate the biosecurity in three feedlots scarcity or totally absent of feedlot requirements  leads diseases to cattle which in turn constraint the live animal export and decrease the requirement of Ethiopia’s livestock in import countries. As statistical evaluation shows the percentage of injury, no isolation of new arrival and sick animals, feed disorder, improper storage of feed, problems in the farm including scarcity of materials, absence of vaccination and  contact of species of animals that were not the member of the species those in feedlot were significant reason in study area. Individually all person should take responsibility to present quality livestock for export requirement. Keywords: Adama, feedlot, livestock export, management and biosecurity, quarantine, questionnaire survey, Ethiopia DOI: 10.7176/ALST/83-04 Publication date: November 30 th 2020
Adama检疫站的牲畜出口:在活体动物出口前比较饲养场的管理和生物安全,DireDawa,埃塞俄比亚
本研究旨在描述和确定安道麦疫区饲养场行业的饲养实践和主要制约因素。三个饲养场被用来收集数据,以比较每个饲养场的管理和生物安全,并确定动物处理不当对埃塞俄比亚动物出口的影响。将收集到的问卷数据进行编码并录入到Microsoft Excel电子表格中,使用SPSS 16.0版软件进行分析。对40名检疫工作人员进行了问卷调查,其中包括管理人员、兽医负责人和日常劳动人员。在40人中,62.5%(25/40)的人回答了在检疫中发现的动物受伤,无论是由于运输原因还是在饲养场发现的管理不到位。当我们看到每个检疫站的死亡动物数量时,它们的数量差别很大。例如,科舍检疫站和万集检疫站的死亡动物数分别为11只(2.2%)和12只(0.75%),但两检疫站的死亡动物数与在农场发现的动物数相比存在显著差异。根据受访者和统计评价率,三个饲养场的生物安全缺乏或完全没有饲养场要求导致牛患病,这反过来限制了活畜出口,降低了进口国对埃塞俄比亚牲畜的需求。统计评估表明,受伤比例、未隔离新到病畜、饲料混乱、饲料储存不当、猪场材料短缺、未接种疫苗、与非畜种动物接触等问题是研究区主要原因。每个人都应负责提供符合出口要求的优质牲畜。关键词:安道麦,饲养场,牲畜出口,管理和生物安全,检疫,问卷调查,埃塞俄比亚DOI: 10.7176/ALST/83-04出版日期:2020年11月30日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信