Peer-assisted content distribution in Akamai netsession

Mingchen Zhao, Paarijaat Aditya, Ang Chen, Yin Lin, Andreas Haeberlen, P. Druschel, B. Maggs, Bill Wishon, M. Ponec
{"title":"Peer-assisted content distribution in Akamai netsession","authors":"Mingchen Zhao, Paarijaat Aditya, Ang Chen, Yin Lin, Andreas Haeberlen, P. Druschel, B. Maggs, Bill Wishon, M. Ponec","doi":"10.1145/2504730.2504752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Content distribution systems have traditionally adopted one of two architectures: infrastructure-based content delivery networks (CDNs), in which clients download content from dedicated, centrally managed servers, and peer-to-peer CDNs, in which clients download content from each other. The advantages and disadvantages of each architecture have been studied in great detail. Recently, hybrid, or 'peer-assisted', CDNs have emerged, which combine elements from both architectures. The properties of such systems, however, are not as well understood. In this paper, we discuss the potential risks and benefits of peer-assisted CDNs, and we study one specific instance, Akamai's NetSession system, to examine the impact of these risks and benefits in practice. NetSession is a mature system that has been operating commercially since 2010 and currently has more than 25 million users in 239 countries and territories. Our results show that NetSession can deliver several of the key benefits of both infrastructure-based and peer-to-peer CDNs - for instance, it can offload 70-80% of the traffic to peers without a corresponding loss of performance or reliability - and that the risks can be managed well. This suggests that hybrid designs may be an attractive option for future CDNs.","PeriodicalId":155913,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference","volume":"2017 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"104","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2504730.2504752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

Abstract

Content distribution systems have traditionally adopted one of two architectures: infrastructure-based content delivery networks (CDNs), in which clients download content from dedicated, centrally managed servers, and peer-to-peer CDNs, in which clients download content from each other. The advantages and disadvantages of each architecture have been studied in great detail. Recently, hybrid, or 'peer-assisted', CDNs have emerged, which combine elements from both architectures. The properties of such systems, however, are not as well understood. In this paper, we discuss the potential risks and benefits of peer-assisted CDNs, and we study one specific instance, Akamai's NetSession system, to examine the impact of these risks and benefits in practice. NetSession is a mature system that has been operating commercially since 2010 and currently has more than 25 million users in 239 countries and territories. Our results show that NetSession can deliver several of the key benefits of both infrastructure-based and peer-to-peer CDNs - for instance, it can offload 70-80% of the traffic to peers without a corresponding loss of performance or reliability - and that the risks can be managed well. This suggests that hybrid designs may be an attractive option for future CDNs.
Akamai netsession中的对等辅助内容分发
内容分发系统传统上采用两种体系结构之一:基于基础设施的内容交付网络(cdn),其中客户端从专用的、集中管理的服务器下载内容;以及点对点cdn,其中客户端从彼此下载内容。每种体系结构的优点和缺点都进行了详细的研究。最近,混合型或“对等辅助”的cdn出现了,它结合了这两种体系结构的元素。然而,这些系统的性质还没有被很好地理解。在本文中,我们讨论了对等辅助cdn的潜在风险和收益,并研究了一个具体的实例,Akamai的NetSession系统,以检查这些风险和收益在实践中的影响。NetSession是一个成熟的系统,自2010年开始商业化运营,目前在239个国家和地区拥有超过2500万用户。我们的结果表明,NetSession可以提供基于基础设施和点对点cdn的几个关键优势——例如,它可以将70-80%的流量卸载到对等端,而不会造成相应的性能或可靠性损失——并且可以很好地管理风险。这表明混合设计可能是未来cdn的一个有吸引力的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信