Joscha Buech, Caroline Radner, Thomas G Fabry, K. Horke, Ahmad Ali, S. Saha, C. Hagl, M. Pichlmaier, S. Peterss
{"title":"Visceral and renal malperfusion syndromes in acute aortic dissection type A: the fate of the branch vessel.","authors":"Joscha Buech, Caroline Radner, Thomas G Fabry, K. Horke, Ahmad Ali, S. Saha, C. Hagl, M. Pichlmaier, S. Peterss","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12276-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nMalperfusion in acute aortic dissection is not uncommonly observed and associated with a highly significant increase in mortality and morbidity. Of the various malperfusion syndromes, visceral and renal involvement is the most challenging in terms of correct and timely diagnosis as well as the choice of management strategy. The purpose of this study was to identify the pathology and associated fate of each visceral and renal vessel in acute type A dissections.\n\n\nMETHODS\nOver a 12-year period, 167 consecutive patients with acute dissection type A extending into the thoracoabdominal aorta were included and radiographic images analysed with a focus on individual branch vessel pathology and dependent organ perfusion.\n\n\nRESULTS\n65 patients (39%) were diagnosed with radiological signs of malperfusion on the CT Images. Of those, 20% expired during the hospital stay, compared to 8% without malperfusion. The left renal artery was the most frequently affected by dissection (31%) or false lumen supply (28%). False lumen perfusion was more often associated with manifest malperfusion than an extension of the dissection flap into the branch vessel. During the study period, there was no preference of surgical procedure treating the malperfusion.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nMalperfusion of the visceral/renal branches of a dissected aorta represents a manifest indicator for postoperative mortality and morbidity. Neither clinical outcome, nor the fate of individual vessels can reliably be predicted prior to proximal reconstruction and thus, surgical strategy cannot generally be defined alone by radiological findings.","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12276-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Malperfusion in acute aortic dissection is not uncommonly observed and associated with a highly significant increase in mortality and morbidity. Of the various malperfusion syndromes, visceral and renal involvement is the most challenging in terms of correct and timely diagnosis as well as the choice of management strategy. The purpose of this study was to identify the pathology and associated fate of each visceral and renal vessel in acute type A dissections.
METHODS
Over a 12-year period, 167 consecutive patients with acute dissection type A extending into the thoracoabdominal aorta were included and radiographic images analysed with a focus on individual branch vessel pathology and dependent organ perfusion.
RESULTS
65 patients (39%) were diagnosed with radiological signs of malperfusion on the CT Images. Of those, 20% expired during the hospital stay, compared to 8% without malperfusion. The left renal artery was the most frequently affected by dissection (31%) or false lumen supply (28%). False lumen perfusion was more often associated with manifest malperfusion than an extension of the dissection flap into the branch vessel. During the study period, there was no preference of surgical procedure treating the malperfusion.
CONCLUSIONS
Malperfusion of the visceral/renal branches of a dissected aorta represents a manifest indicator for postoperative mortality and morbidity. Neither clinical outcome, nor the fate of individual vessels can reliably be predicted prior to proximal reconstruction and thus, surgical strategy cannot generally be defined alone by radiological findings.