LEVELS OF PAIN IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY INVASIVE PROCEDURES IN TRANS-RADIAL VERSUS TRANS-FEMORAL APPROACHES: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Shagufta Tasneem, Nazia Ilyas
{"title":"LEVELS OF PAIN IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY INVASIVE PROCEDURES IN TRANS-RADIAL VERSUS TRANS-FEMORAL APPROACHES: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY","authors":"Shagufta Tasneem, Nazia Ilyas","doi":"10.31674/MJN.2018.V10I01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trends for invasion site for coronary interventions are shifting from femoral to radial approach because of the advantageous effects. Assessment of pain associated with puncture site in both approaches (radial/femoral) is important. Purpose of this study is to find the difference in post procedural access site pain in patients undergoing coronary invasive procedures in trans-radial versus trans-femoral approach and its association with age, gender and BMI. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 75 randomly selected patients who underwent coronary invasive procedures. A structured questionnaire used for demographic and biophysical data, procedural data and Numerical Pain Rating Scale to assess the pain.\n\nOut of 75 patients 42 patients received trans-femoral access and 33 received trans-radial access. Post procedural access site pain in trans-femoral site felt at mild and moderate level 64.2% vs. 23.8 % respectively. While on same rating scale in radial group felt at mild and moderate level 42.4% vs. 33.3 % with p-value 0.611 (>0.05). The mean difference in gender with males 69.3 % versus females 30.6 % showed from analysis that both sexes felt pain at mild level on pain rating scale resulting p-value 0.046 (< 0.05). Statistically significant level of pain was associated with obese patients resulting p -value 0.299 (> 0.05).\n\nPatient undergoing coronary intervention through femoral site invasion experience more post procedural access site pain than radial site invasion. Pain level is increased in obese and aged population.","PeriodicalId":128467,"journal":{"name":"Volume-10 : Issue 1, July, 2018","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume-10 : Issue 1, July, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31674/MJN.2018.V10I01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Trends for invasion site for coronary interventions are shifting from femoral to radial approach because of the advantageous effects. Assessment of pain associated with puncture site in both approaches (radial/femoral) is important. Purpose of this study is to find the difference in post procedural access site pain in patients undergoing coronary invasive procedures in trans-radial versus trans-femoral approach and its association with age, gender and BMI. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 75 randomly selected patients who underwent coronary invasive procedures. A structured questionnaire used for demographic and biophysical data, procedural data and Numerical Pain Rating Scale to assess the pain. Out of 75 patients 42 patients received trans-femoral access and 33 received trans-radial access. Post procedural access site pain in trans-femoral site felt at mild and moderate level 64.2% vs. 23.8 % respectively. While on same rating scale in radial group felt at mild and moderate level 42.4% vs. 33.3 % with p-value 0.611 (>0.05). The mean difference in gender with males 69.3 % versus females 30.6 % showed from analysis that both sexes felt pain at mild level on pain rating scale resulting p-value 0.046 (< 0.05). Statistically significant level of pain was associated with obese patients resulting p -value 0.299 (> 0.05). Patient undergoing coronary intervention through femoral site invasion experience more post procedural access site pain than radial site invasion. Pain level is increased in obese and aged population.
经桡动脉入路与经股动脉入路冠状动脉侵入性手术患者疼痛水平的横断面研究
冠状动脉介入治疗的侵入部位正从股动脉入路向桡动脉入路转移,因为桡动脉入路具有优势。评估两种入路(桡骨/股骨)穿刺部位的疼痛是很重要的。本研究旨在探讨经桡动脉入路与经股动脉入路冠状动脉有创手术患者术后通路部位疼痛的差异及其与年龄、性别和BMI的关系。一项横断面研究对75名随机选择的接受冠状动脉侵入性手术的患者进行了研究。一份结构化的调查问卷,用于统计和生物物理数据,程序数据和数字疼痛评定量表来评估疼痛。在75名患者中,42名患者接受了经股通路,33名患者接受了经桡骨通路。术后经股部位疼痛为轻度和中度,分别为64.2%和23.8%。在同一评定量表上,桡骨组感觉轻度和中度为42.4%比33.3%,p值为0.611(>0.05)。男性和女性在疼痛评定量表上的平均差异为69.3%和30.6%,分析结果显示,男性和女性在疼痛评定量表上均处于轻度疼痛水平,p值为0.046(< 0.05)。疼痛程度与肥胖患者相关,p值为0.299(> 0.05)。经股动脉侵位行冠状动脉介入治疗的患者术后疼痛程度高于桡动脉侵位。肥胖和老年人群的疼痛程度增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信