A systematic review of psychological treatments for women presenting with factitious disorder and factitious disorder imposed on another

Georgia Tooby, Yasmin Siddall, M. Clarke
{"title":"A systematic review of psychological treatments for women presenting with factitious disorder and factitious disorder imposed on another","authors":"Georgia Tooby, Yasmin Siddall, M. Clarke","doi":"10.53841/bpsfu.2022.1.141.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Little is known about the psychological treatments for Factitious Disorder (FD) and Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA) in women. The literature is limited and consists of case series and case reports. To date there has been no systematic review of the effectiveness of the psychological treatments. This review aims to identify which psychological treatments have been used to treat FD and FDIA, to hypothesise a psychological treatment strategy which can be implemented in clinical practice and evaluated in future research. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and summarise psychological treatments which have been effective when treating FD and FDIA in women.Methods: A total of 543 records were screened, and 29 remaining papers were reviewed. A supplementary search was then conducted using the reference lists of eligible studies. In total 29 eligible studies yielded a sample of 38 cases. Information extracted included study characteristics, type of psychological therapy, co-morbid disorders, other treatment methods, childhood maltreatment, effective and non-effective outcomes, clinical measures and follow up.Results: Our findings offer an important first step towards an evidence-based approach to the disorder. A narrative synthesis was undertaken to describe the characteristics, quality, and outcomes of studies. The narrative synthesis surveyed the state of knowledge and provided an overview and integration of psychological treatments of FD and FDIA in women.Conclusion: This review highlights there is no standardised approach for psychological treatment in FD and FDIA. It is recommended that consistency of care, a good therapeutic relationship, and adoption of a holistic and integrative approach to treatment which is grounded in individualised formulation may be fundamental in achieving effective outcomes. The fi dings provide a basis for several clinical recommendations and a robust first step towards an evidence-based approach for the psychological treatments of FD and FDIA in women.","PeriodicalId":426788,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Update","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfu.2022.1.141.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the psychological treatments for Factitious Disorder (FD) and Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA) in women. The literature is limited and consists of case series and case reports. To date there has been no systematic review of the effectiveness of the psychological treatments. This review aims to identify which psychological treatments have been used to treat FD and FDIA, to hypothesise a psychological treatment strategy which can be implemented in clinical practice and evaluated in future research. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and summarise psychological treatments which have been effective when treating FD and FDIA in women.Methods: A total of 543 records were screened, and 29 remaining papers were reviewed. A supplementary search was then conducted using the reference lists of eligible studies. In total 29 eligible studies yielded a sample of 38 cases. Information extracted included study characteristics, type of psychological therapy, co-morbid disorders, other treatment methods, childhood maltreatment, effective and non-effective outcomes, clinical measures and follow up.Results: Our findings offer an important first step towards an evidence-based approach to the disorder. A narrative synthesis was undertaken to describe the characteristics, quality, and outcomes of studies. The narrative synthesis surveyed the state of knowledge and provided an overview and integration of psychological treatments of FD and FDIA in women.Conclusion: This review highlights there is no standardised approach for psychological treatment in FD and FDIA. It is recommended that consistency of care, a good therapeutic relationship, and adoption of a holistic and integrative approach to treatment which is grounded in individualised formulation may be fundamental in achieving effective outcomes. The fi dings provide a basis for several clinical recommendations and a robust first step towards an evidence-based approach for the psychological treatments of FD and FDIA in women.
对以人为障碍和人为障碍强加于他人为表现的妇女的心理治疗的系统回顾
背景:对女性人为障碍(FD)和人为强加于他人障碍(FDIA)的心理治疗知之甚少。文献是有限的,包括病例系列和病例报告。到目前为止,还没有关于心理治疗有效性的系统评价。本综述旨在确定哪些心理治疗方法已被用于治疗FD和FDIA,并假设一种可在临床实践中实施并在未来研究中评估的心理治疗策略。本系统综述的目的是识别和总结治疗女性FD和FDIA的有效心理治疗方法。方法:对543篇文献进行筛选,对其余29篇文献进行复习。然后使用符合条件的研究参考列表进行补充检索。总共29项符合条件的研究产生了38例样本。提取的信息包括研究特征、心理治疗类型、共病障碍、其他治疗方法、儿童虐待、有效和无效结局、临床措施和随访。结果:我们的发现为以证据为基础的方法治疗这种疾病提供了重要的第一步。对研究的特点、质量和结果进行了叙述性综合描述。叙事综合调查了知识状况,对女性FD和FDIA的心理治疗进行了概述和整合。结论:本综述强调FD和FDIA的心理治疗没有标准化的方法。建议护理的一致性、良好的治疗关系以及采用以个体化方案为基础的整体和综合治疗方法可能是实现有效结果的基础。研究结果为一些临床建议提供了基础,并为女性FD和FDIA的心理治疗提供了循证方法的坚实的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信