Who has ‘the right stuff’? human capital, entrepreneurship and institutional change in China

Charles E. Eesley
{"title":"Who has ‘the right stuff’? human capital, entrepreneurship and institutional change in China","authors":"Charles E. Eesley","doi":"10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that, contrary to conventional thought, the market development of the institutional environment not only lowers constraints to entrepreneurship, but in addition, encourages those of higher ability to choose entrepreneurship through an increase in expected returns. The data exploits a natural experiment to explore the transition to entrepreneurship using a differences-in-differences approach (over time and across regions). The results provide evidence that the greatest increase in entrepreneurship after the 1999 constitutional amendment (which made illegal prior discriminatory policies preventing the growth of entrepreneurial firms) was among the top quartiles of the ability distribution. The findings suggest that the selection of high quality individuals into entrepreneurship is shaped less by the relaxation of constraints such as the costs of entry and more by the risk/return profile of founding a firm. In addition, both developing and developed countries may want to consider institutions that encourage high human capital individuals to enter entrepreneurship since their firms are found to have higher productivity and to be more innovative. This paper analyzes unique data from a recently conducted survey of alumni graduating from 1947–2007 from a technical university in China.","PeriodicalId":185147,"journal":{"name":"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

This paper argues that, contrary to conventional thought, the market development of the institutional environment not only lowers constraints to entrepreneurship, but in addition, encourages those of higher ability to choose entrepreneurship through an increase in expected returns. The data exploits a natural experiment to explore the transition to entrepreneurship using a differences-in-differences approach (over time and across regions). The results provide evidence that the greatest increase in entrepreneurship after the 1999 constitutional amendment (which made illegal prior discriminatory policies preventing the growth of entrepreneurial firms) was among the top quartiles of the ability distribution. The findings suggest that the selection of high quality individuals into entrepreneurship is shaped less by the relaxation of constraints such as the costs of entry and more by the risk/return profile of founding a firm. In addition, both developing and developed countries may want to consider institutions that encourage high human capital individuals to enter entrepreneurship since their firms are found to have higher productivity and to be more innovative. This paper analyzes unique data from a recently conducted survey of alumni graduating from 1947–2007 from a technical university in China.
谁有“合适的东西”?中国的人力资本、企业家精神和制度变迁
本文认为,与传统观点相反,制度环境的市场化发展不仅降低了对创业的约束,而且通过预期收益的增加,鼓励了能力较高的人选择创业。这些数据利用一个自然实验,利用差异中的差异方法(跨时间和跨地区)探索向创业的过渡。研究结果表明,在1999年宪法修正案(该修正案制定了阻止创业公司成长的非法歧视性政策)之后,创业精神增幅最大的是能力分布的前四分之一。研究结果表明,对高质量个人的创业选择较少受到准入成本等限制放宽的影响,而更多地受到创办公司的风险/回报概况的影响。此外,发展中国家和发达国家都可能希望考虑鼓励高人力资本个人进入创业的制度,因为发现他们的公司具有更高的生产力和更具有创新性。本文分析了最近对中国一所技术大学1947-2007届毕业生进行的一项调查的独特数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信