Global Journalism Education

Charles C. Self
{"title":"Global Journalism Education","authors":"Charles C. Self","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of formal programs educating and training young people to work in journalism and mass communication media organizations has grown substantially worldwide since the 1920s. Estimates put the number of college and university programs well beyond 2,500, with the United States and China exhibiting the largest numbers. These estimates do not count many of the private training programs offered by for-profit companies. Beyond these programs, media organizations, foundations, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), journalist associations, and media unions offer training to help students and journalists update their skills in a field undergoing rapid change.\n Much of this growth is because journalism itself has commanded attention from organizations of all kinds in the 21st century: governments, private industry, nonprofits, NGOs, sports organizations—leaders in virtually all forms of human activity have come to believe that media play a powerful role in shaping public opinion.\n This attention has led societies around the globe to invest in training journalists and media workers. Some of these investments have been through higher education. Others have been through private training institutes and organizations, NGOs, and private foundations.\n New types of media jobs have developed since the 1970s. Strategic communication and promotion industries dedicated to shaping public discourse have expanded around the world.\n New media technologies have changed journalism itself, creating new kinds of journalism jobs worldwide. Digital innovation has changed the structure of traditional media industries. As new forms have emerged, these digital innovations have expanded both the types and numbers of media jobs available.\n These new types of media jobs have changed how journalism students are educated and trained. Demand for trained workers has increased and skill sets have changed.\n This has altered thinking about journalism education around the globe. Journalism educators have introduced new types of training into the curriculum, including entirely new topics and new types of majors in many countries.\n Similarities in how journalism is taught, based on shared educational needs and skills, have grown, while historically important ideological differences in teaching journalism have weakened.\n Shared challenges include how to teach media technologies, ethics, fact-checking, and coping with disinformation and fake news. They also include preparing journalism students to deal with strategic manipulation, partisan hostility, threats, and shifting concepts of appropriate online media discourse in social media, blogs, tweets, and online comments.\n Despite these common challenges and shared approaches, unique circumstances in each society still lead to differences in how journalism is taught around the world. These differences can be quite pronounced. These circumstances include resource shortages, competing training traditions, weak industry support, sociopolitical differences, and censorship.\n Across the globe it is clear that education in journalism and media will continue to expand as changing media technologies exert a growing influence on public discourse.\n Journalism education is changing in every country as: (1) technologies reshape it, (2) media theories shift teaching techniques, (3) new technologies create newly shared ideas about teaching journalism, (4) unique circumstances in each country still produce different approaches, and (5) it expands in different regions of the world.","PeriodicalId":307235,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of formal programs educating and training young people to work in journalism and mass communication media organizations has grown substantially worldwide since the 1920s. Estimates put the number of college and university programs well beyond 2,500, with the United States and China exhibiting the largest numbers. These estimates do not count many of the private training programs offered by for-profit companies. Beyond these programs, media organizations, foundations, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), journalist associations, and media unions offer training to help students and journalists update their skills in a field undergoing rapid change. Much of this growth is because journalism itself has commanded attention from organizations of all kinds in the 21st century: governments, private industry, nonprofits, NGOs, sports organizations—leaders in virtually all forms of human activity have come to believe that media play a powerful role in shaping public opinion. This attention has led societies around the globe to invest in training journalists and media workers. Some of these investments have been through higher education. Others have been through private training institutes and organizations, NGOs, and private foundations. New types of media jobs have developed since the 1970s. Strategic communication and promotion industries dedicated to shaping public discourse have expanded around the world. New media technologies have changed journalism itself, creating new kinds of journalism jobs worldwide. Digital innovation has changed the structure of traditional media industries. As new forms have emerged, these digital innovations have expanded both the types and numbers of media jobs available. These new types of media jobs have changed how journalism students are educated and trained. Demand for trained workers has increased and skill sets have changed. This has altered thinking about journalism education around the globe. Journalism educators have introduced new types of training into the curriculum, including entirely new topics and new types of majors in many countries. Similarities in how journalism is taught, based on shared educational needs and skills, have grown, while historically important ideological differences in teaching journalism have weakened. Shared challenges include how to teach media technologies, ethics, fact-checking, and coping with disinformation and fake news. They also include preparing journalism students to deal with strategic manipulation, partisan hostility, threats, and shifting concepts of appropriate online media discourse in social media, blogs, tweets, and online comments. Despite these common challenges and shared approaches, unique circumstances in each society still lead to differences in how journalism is taught around the world. These differences can be quite pronounced. These circumstances include resource shortages, competing training traditions, weak industry support, sociopolitical differences, and censorship. Across the globe it is clear that education in journalism and media will continue to expand as changing media technologies exert a growing influence on public discourse. Journalism education is changing in every country as: (1) technologies reshape it, (2) media theories shift teaching techniques, (3) new technologies create newly shared ideas about teaching journalism, (4) unique circumstances in each country still produce different approaches, and (5) it expands in different regions of the world.
全球新闻教育
自20世纪20年代以来,教育和培训年轻人在新闻和大众传播媒体组织工作的正式项目的数量在世界范围内大幅增加。据估计,学院和大学项目的数量远远超过2500个,其中美国和中国的数量最多。这些估计不包括营利性公司提供的许多私人培训项目。除了这些项目外,媒体组织、基金会、非政府组织、记者协会和媒体联盟还提供培训,帮助学生和记者在一个瞬息万变的领域更新技能。这种增长在很大程度上是因为新闻业本身在21世纪吸引了各种组织的注意:政府、私营企业、非营利组织、非政府组织、体育组织——几乎所有形式的人类活动的领导人都开始相信媒体在塑造公众舆论方面发挥着强大的作用。这种关注促使全球社会投资培训记者和媒体工作者。其中一些投资是通过高等教育进行的。其他人则通过私人培训机构和组织、非政府组织和私人基金会进行培训。自20世纪70年代以来,新型媒体工作不断发展。致力于塑造公共话语的战略传播和推广行业在全球范围内扩张。新媒体技术改变了新闻业本身,在世界范围内创造了新的新闻工作。数字创新改变了传统媒体产业的结构。随着新形式的出现,这些数字创新扩大了媒体工作的类型和数量。这些新型的媒体工作改变了新闻专业学生的教育和培训方式。对训练有素的工人的需求增加了,技能组合也发生了变化。这改变了全球对新闻教育的看法。在许多国家,新闻教育工作者在课程中引入了新的培训类型,包括全新的主题和新类型的专业。基于共同的教育需求和技能,新闻教学的相似之处越来越多,而新闻教学中历史上重要的意识形态差异已经减弱。共同的挑战包括如何教授媒体技术、道德、事实核查以及应对虚假信息和假新闻。它们还包括准备新闻系学生处理战略操纵,党派敌意,威胁,以及在社交媒体,博客,推特和在线评论中适当的在线媒体话语的转变概念。尽管有这些共同的挑战和共同的方法,每个社会的独特情况仍然导致世界各地的新闻教学方式存在差异。这些差异是非常明显的。这些情况包括资源短缺、竞争性的培训传统、薄弱的行业支持、社会政治差异和审查制度。在全球范围内,随着不断变化的媒体技术对公共话语产生越来越大的影响,新闻和媒体教育显然将继续扩大。新闻教育在每个国家都在发生变化,因为:(1)技术重塑了它,(2)媒体理论改变了教学方法,(3)新技术创造了关于新闻教学的新共享理念,(4)每个国家的独特情况仍然产生不同的方法,(5)它在世界不同地区扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信