CONCLUSION:

A. Genova, A. Scavarda, M. Świątkiewicz-Mośny
{"title":"CONCLUSION:","authors":"A. Genova, A. Scavarda, M. Świątkiewicz-Mośny","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv23g7wf8.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter presents the similarities and the differences between the different case studies reported in the book and suggests some conclusion on the impact of COVID-19 on policies and practices devoted to persons with cognitive disabilities from a macro, meso and micro point of view. The COVID-19 surveillance regime has made people with disabilities, and particularly with intellectual ones, even more invisible, since their rights have been consistently under-represented in the different national contexts. Persons with intellectual disabilities have been considered objects of protection and this overprotective stance turns into an increasing process of institutionalisation, segregation and familiarisation of care. The COVID-19 surveillance regime has brought into light the limits of the implementation of the UN Convention and of the EU Strategy, but the book and the emerging epistemic community, in the framework of public sociology, contribute to support the rights of all persons, with or without disabilities, in public welfare policies in Europe. © 2023 Anjali Ghosh and Eleni Koutsogeorgou. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":364986,"journal":{"name":"Dreams of Flight","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dreams of Flight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv23g7wf8.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter presents the similarities and the differences between the different case studies reported in the book and suggests some conclusion on the impact of COVID-19 on policies and practices devoted to persons with cognitive disabilities from a macro, meso and micro point of view. The COVID-19 surveillance regime has made people with disabilities, and particularly with intellectual ones, even more invisible, since their rights have been consistently under-represented in the different national contexts. Persons with intellectual disabilities have been considered objects of protection and this overprotective stance turns into an increasing process of institutionalisation, segregation and familiarisation of care. The COVID-19 surveillance regime has brought into light the limits of the implementation of the UN Convention and of the EU Strategy, but the book and the emerging epistemic community, in the framework of public sociology, contribute to support the rights of all persons, with or without disabilities, in public welfare policies in Europe. © 2023 Anjali Ghosh and Eleni Koutsogeorgou. All rights reserved.
结论:
本章介绍了书中报告的不同案例研究之间的异同,并从宏观、中观和微观角度就COVID-19对专门针对认知障碍者的政策和做法的影响提出了一些结论。COVID-19监测制度使残疾人,特别是智力残疾人更加隐形,因为他们的权利在不同的国家背景下一直没有得到充分代表。智力残疾者被认为是保护的对象,这种过度保护的立场变成了日益制度化、隔离和熟悉护理的过程。COVID-19监测制度暴露了执行《联合国公约》和《欧盟战略》的局限性,但在公共社会学框架内,这本书和新兴的知识共同体有助于支持欧洲公共福利政策中所有人(无论有无残疾)的权利。©2023 Anjali Ghosh和Eleni Koutsogeorgou。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信