Mitigating the Effects of Auditors’ First Impressions of Client Personnel: The Importance of Supervisors’ Preference for Effectiveness

Darin Holderness Jr., Alyssa S. J. Ong, Mark F. Zimbelman
{"title":"Mitigating the Effects of Auditors’ First Impressions of Client Personnel: The Importance of Supervisors’ Preference for Effectiveness","authors":"Darin Holderness Jr., Alyssa S. J. Ong, Mark F. Zimbelman","doi":"10.2308/jfar-2020-028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fraud perpetrators realize the importance of conveying a positive first impression to others. We examine how auditors’ first impressions of client personnel interact with their supervisors’ preferences for audit effectiveness or efficiency to influence auditors’ risk judgments. We argue that auditors are typically focused on efficiency and, therefore, in an intuitive mindset that makes them susceptible to first impression biases. We therefore expect a positive (negative) first impression to decrease (increase) auditor objectivity and cause auditors to become less (more) sensitive to misstatement risk. We predict that supervisors’ preferences for effectiveness (over efficiency) will lead auditors to adopt an analytical mindset and mitigate the effects of first impressions. Our 2´2 experiment with 124 practicing auditors manipulates both first impression (positive vs. negative) and supervisor preference (effectiveness vs. efficiency) and supports our predictions. These findings build on first-impression research in psychology that suggests first impressions are subconscious and difficult to mitigate.","PeriodicalId":149240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2020-028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fraud perpetrators realize the importance of conveying a positive first impression to others. We examine how auditors’ first impressions of client personnel interact with their supervisors’ preferences for audit effectiveness or efficiency to influence auditors’ risk judgments. We argue that auditors are typically focused on efficiency and, therefore, in an intuitive mindset that makes them susceptible to first impression biases. We therefore expect a positive (negative) first impression to decrease (increase) auditor objectivity and cause auditors to become less (more) sensitive to misstatement risk. We predict that supervisors’ preferences for effectiveness (over efficiency) will lead auditors to adopt an analytical mindset and mitigate the effects of first impressions. Our 2´2 experiment with 124 practicing auditors manipulates both first impression (positive vs. negative) and supervisor preference (effectiveness vs. efficiency) and supports our predictions. These findings build on first-impression research in psychology that suggests first impressions are subconscious and difficult to mitigate.
减轻审计人员对客户人员第一印象的影响:主管对有效性偏好的重要性
诈骗犯意识到给别人留下积极的第一印象的重要性。我们研究了审计师对客户人员的第一印象如何与其主管对审计有效性或效率的偏好相互作用,从而影响审计师的风险判断。我们认为,审计师通常专注于效率,因此,在一种直觉的心态,使他们容易受到第一印象偏见。因此,我们预计积极(消极)的第一印象会降低(增加)审计师的客观性,并导致审计师对错报风险变得更不(更)敏感。我们预测,管理者对有效性(而非效率)的偏好将导致审计师采用分析思维,并减轻第一印象的影响。我们对124名执业审计师进行的2´2实验操纵了第一印象(积极vs消极)和主管偏好(有效性vs效率),并支持了我们的预测。这些发现建立在心理学第一印象研究的基础上,该研究表明第一印象是潜意识的,很难缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信