An experimental comparison of modern methods of segmentation

P. Karch, I. Zolotová
{"title":"An experimental comparison of modern methods of segmentation","authors":"P. Karch, I. Zolotová","doi":"10.1109/SAMI.2010.5423728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with experimental comparison of classical method of Graph cut segmentation with segmentation using Active contours. From methods of Active contours are chosen to comparison two methods. First method is based on classic Active contour method and second method is based on Active contours independent on gradient of the edges. Application of Graph cut segmentation allows finding the optimal global segmentation with the best balance between regional and boundary conditions among all possible segmentations at met condition limitations. Active contour segments the image by iterative deformation contour till this contour divided the image on the regions. Active contours are often implemented with level set methods for their universality and performance, but disadvantage is their computational complexity. The second method of the active contour allows to detect objects whose boundaries are not necessarily defined by gradient. The end rule in this case does not depend on gradient of the image, as in classical model of active contour, but instead refer to a particular segmentation of the image.","PeriodicalId":306051,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAMI.2010.5423728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

This paper deals with experimental comparison of classical method of Graph cut segmentation with segmentation using Active contours. From methods of Active contours are chosen to comparison two methods. First method is based on classic Active contour method and second method is based on Active contours independent on gradient of the edges. Application of Graph cut segmentation allows finding the optimal global segmentation with the best balance between regional and boundary conditions among all possible segmentations at met condition limitations. Active contour segments the image by iterative deformation contour till this contour divided the image on the regions. Active contours are often implemented with level set methods for their universality and performance, but disadvantage is their computational complexity. The second method of the active contour allows to detect objects whose boundaries are not necessarily defined by gradient. The end rule in this case does not depend on gradient of the image, as in classical model of active contour, but instead refer to a particular segmentation of the image.
现代分割方法的实验比较
本文对经典的图割分割方法与活动轮廓分割方法进行了实验比较。从活动轮廓的方法选择,比较两种方法。第一种方法是基于经典的活动轮廓法,第二种方法是基于不依赖于边缘梯度的活动轮廓。图割分割的应用可以在满足条件限制的条件下,在所有可能的分割中找到区域和边界条件之间最佳平衡的最佳全局分割。活动轮廓通过迭代变形轮廓对图像进行分割,直到该轮廓在区域上对图像进行分割。由于活动轮廓具有通用性和高性能,常用水平集方法实现活动轮廓,但缺点是计算量大。活动轮廓的第二种方法允许检测边界不一定由梯度定义的对象。在这种情况下,结束规则不依赖于图像的梯度,而在经典的活动轮廓模型中,而是指图像的特定分割。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信