Dominant tactics in social movement tactical repertoires: Anti-gay ballot measures, 1974–2008

A. Stone
{"title":"Dominant tactics in social movement tactical repertoires: Anti-gay ballot measures, 1974–2008","authors":"A. Stone","doi":"10.1108/S0163-786X(2011)0000031008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study theorizes about the development of dominant tactics within social movements, as certain tactics within a tactical repertoire are used frequently and imbued with ideological significance. Little research has been done on hierarchies within tactical repertoires, assuming that all tactics within a repertoire are equal. Between 1974 and 2008, the US Religious Right attempted over 200 anti-gay referendums and initiatives to retract or prevent gay rights laws. This research examines how the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) movement developed campaign tactics to fight these direct democracy measures. This research expands the existing literature on tactical repertoires by theorizing about the mechanisms by which tactics become dominant, namely, their affirmation by victories, responsiveness to countermovement escalation, and involvement of institutionalized social movement organizations to disseminate tactics. This research contradicts existing movement–countermovement literature that suggests that movements do not develop dominant tactics when mobilizing in opposition to a countermovement.","PeriodicalId":314175,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X(2011)0000031008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study theorizes about the development of dominant tactics within social movements, as certain tactics within a tactical repertoire are used frequently and imbued with ideological significance. Little research has been done on hierarchies within tactical repertoires, assuming that all tactics within a repertoire are equal. Between 1974 and 2008, the US Religious Right attempted over 200 anti-gay referendums and initiatives to retract or prevent gay rights laws. This research examines how the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) movement developed campaign tactics to fight these direct democracy measures. This research expands the existing literature on tactical repertoires by theorizing about the mechanisms by which tactics become dominant, namely, their affirmation by victories, responsiveness to countermovement escalation, and involvement of institutionalized social movement organizations to disseminate tactics. This research contradicts existing movement–countermovement literature that suggests that movements do not develop dominant tactics when mobilizing in opposition to a countermovement.
社会运动战术中的主导策略:反同性恋投票措施,1974-2008
这项研究对社会运动中主导战术的发展进行了理论化,因为战术剧目中的某些战术经常被使用并充满了意识形态意义。很少有人研究战术套路中的等级,假设一个套路中的所有战术都是平等的。1974年至2008年间,美国宗教权利组织试图进行200多次反同性恋公投和倡议,以撤销或阻止同性恋权利法律。本研究考察了女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人(LGBT)运动是如何发展出对抗这些直接民主措施的竞选策略的。本研究扩展了现有的关于战术技能的文献,将战术成为主导的机制理论化,即胜利对战术的肯定,对反运动升级的反应,以及制度化的社会运动组织对战术传播的参与。这项研究与现有的运动-反运动文献相矛盾,这些文献认为运动在动员反对反运动时不会发展出主导策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信