Who to share information with? A model of strategic diffusion in social networks

Shomak Chakrabarti
{"title":"Who to share information with? A model of strategic diffusion in social networks","authors":"Shomak Chakrabarti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3390062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I study information diffusion in a social network where a third party can control the precision of information as well as who initially receives information. Applications include spreading of news by digital media outlets, lobbyists persuading senators to contribute to a project and others. A designer engages in a bayesian persuasion game with multiple agents, but is constrained to send information privately to a subset of agents. The agents can communicate this information to each other through links in a social network. The designer relies on this word-of-mouth communication channel to diffuse information. The optimal precision of information sent by the designer reflects a fundamental tradeoff: precise information increases diffusion, but reduces the designer’s ability to manipulate the agents’ beliefs to- wards his objective. The optimal seeding strategy involves choosing an agent with the highest “influence”, a novel centrality measure that is determined in endogenously by information accuracy and the network structure. As preferences become more diverse, I show that there exists equilibrium with sub- optimal spreading where the designer caters only to agents relatively more aligned towards his objective.","PeriodicalId":232169,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3390062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I study information diffusion in a social network where a third party can control the precision of information as well as who initially receives information. Applications include spreading of news by digital media outlets, lobbyists persuading senators to contribute to a project and others. A designer engages in a bayesian persuasion game with multiple agents, but is constrained to send information privately to a subset of agents. The agents can communicate this information to each other through links in a social network. The designer relies on this word-of-mouth communication channel to diffuse information. The optimal precision of information sent by the designer reflects a fundamental tradeoff: precise information increases diffusion, but reduces the designer’s ability to manipulate the agents’ beliefs to- wards his objective. The optimal seeding strategy involves choosing an agent with the highest “influence”, a novel centrality measure that is determined in endogenously by information accuracy and the network structure. As preferences become more diverse, I show that there exists equilibrium with sub- optimal spreading where the designer caters only to agents relatively more aligned towards his objective.
与谁分享信息?社会网络中的战略扩散模型
我研究的是社交网络中的信息扩散,在社交网络中,第三方可以控制信息的准确性,也可以控制最先接收信息的人。应用包括通过数字媒体传播新闻,游说人士说服参议员为某个项目捐款等。设计师与多个代理进行贝叶斯说服博弈,但被限制私下向代理子集发送信息。代理可以通过社交网络中的链接相互传递这些信息。设计师依靠这种口碑传播渠道来传播信息。设计者发送的信息的最优精度反映了一个基本的权衡:精确的信息增加了传播,但降低了设计者操纵代理人的信念以实现其目标的能力。最优播种策略涉及选择具有最高“影响力”的代理,这是一种新颖的中心性度量,由信息精度和网络结构内生地决定。当偏好变得更加多样化时,我表明存在着次最优传播的均衡,设计者只迎合相对更接近他的目标的代理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信