Regional anesthesia in spine surgery: A narrative review

David S. Salven, D. Sykes, Melissa M. Erickson, Khoi D. Than, P. Grossi, C. Crutcher, M. Berger, W. Bullock, J. Gadsden, M. Abd-El-Barr
{"title":"Regional anesthesia in spine surgery: A narrative review","authors":"David S. Salven, D. Sykes, Melissa M. Erickson, Khoi D. Than, P. Grossi, C. Crutcher, M. Berger, W. Bullock, J. Gadsden, M. Abd-El-Barr","doi":"10.18502/jsp.v2i2.13223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Regional anesthesia, which refers to the use of anesthetics to provide analgesia to a specific body part or nervous innervation territory, has become increasingly popular in the field of spine surgery. With the application of these techniques, it has been postulated that patients will require less systemic analgesia, intraoperatively and postoperatively. The authors of this narrative review discuss the common regional anesthetic modalities applied to spine surgery, in addition to patient selection criteria, success in patients with multiple comorbid illnesses, and its adoption by surgeons. \nMaterials and Methods: An advanced search was performed in the PubMed database to obtain Englishlanguage articles discussing regional anesthesia, awake spine surgery, and postoperative complications. Articles were screened for relevance, and 47 articles were incorporated into this narrative review. \nResults: Classic neuraxial and paraspinal techniques have allowed surgeons to perform posterior decompression, fusion, and revision procedures. Transversus abdominus plane and quadratus lumborum blocks have enabled better pain control in patients undergoing surgeries requiring anterior or lateral approaches. Documented benefits of regional anesthesia include shorter operative time, improved pain control and hemodynamic stability, as well as decreased cost and length of stay. Several case series have demonstrated the success of these techniques in highly comorbid patients. \nConclusion: Regional anesthesia provides an exciting opportunity to make surgical treatment possible for spine patients with significant comorbidities. Although additional randomized controlled trials are necessary to further refine patient selection criteria, current data demonstrates its safety and efficacy in the operating room.","PeriodicalId":199836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jsp.v2i2.13223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regional anesthesia, which refers to the use of anesthetics to provide analgesia to a specific body part or nervous innervation territory, has become increasingly popular in the field of spine surgery. With the application of these techniques, it has been postulated that patients will require less systemic analgesia, intraoperatively and postoperatively. The authors of this narrative review discuss the common regional anesthetic modalities applied to spine surgery, in addition to patient selection criteria, success in patients with multiple comorbid illnesses, and its adoption by surgeons. Materials and Methods: An advanced search was performed in the PubMed database to obtain Englishlanguage articles discussing regional anesthesia, awake spine surgery, and postoperative complications. Articles were screened for relevance, and 47 articles were incorporated into this narrative review. Results: Classic neuraxial and paraspinal techniques have allowed surgeons to perform posterior decompression, fusion, and revision procedures. Transversus abdominus plane and quadratus lumborum blocks have enabled better pain control in patients undergoing surgeries requiring anterior or lateral approaches. Documented benefits of regional anesthesia include shorter operative time, improved pain control and hemodynamic stability, as well as decreased cost and length of stay. Several case series have demonstrated the success of these techniques in highly comorbid patients. Conclusion: Regional anesthesia provides an exciting opportunity to make surgical treatment possible for spine patients with significant comorbidities. Although additional randomized controlled trials are necessary to further refine patient selection criteria, current data demonstrates its safety and efficacy in the operating room.
脊柱手术中的区域麻醉:综述
背景:区域麻醉是指使用麻醉药对特定的身体部位或神经支配区域提供镇痛作用,在脊柱外科领域越来越流行。随着这些技术的应用,人们认为患者术中和术后需要更少的全身镇痛。这篇叙述性综述的作者讨论了脊柱手术中常用的区域麻醉模式,除了患者选择标准,多种合并症患者的成功,以及外科医生的采用。材料和方法:在PubMed数据库中进行高级检索,以获得讨论区域麻醉、清醒脊柱手术和术后并发症的英文文章。文章被筛选相关性,47篇文章被纳入这篇叙述性综述。结果:传统的轴突和棘旁技术允许外科医生进行后路减压、融合和翻修手术。腹横平面和腰方肌阻滞可以更好地控制需要前路或外侧入路手术的患者的疼痛。文献记载的区域麻醉的好处包括缩短手术时间,改善疼痛控制和血流动力学稳定性,以及降低费用和住院时间。几个系列的病例已经证明了这些技术在高度合并症患者中的成功。结论:区域麻醉为脊柱并发症患者的手术治疗提供了一个令人兴奋的机会。虽然需要额外的随机对照试验来进一步完善患者选择标准,但目前的数据表明其在手术室的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信