Intelligent P controller and disturbance observer based PI controller comparison

P. Tapák, M. Huba
{"title":"Intelligent P controller and disturbance observer based PI controller comparison","authors":"P. Tapák, M. Huba","doi":"10.1109/PC.2015.7169996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper shows analogies between two separately evolved areas of PID control, the disturbance observer based controllers and the “intelligent” PID controllers. The simplest “intelligent” PID controller is represented by the “intelligent P” controller denoted as iP. It is designed for the simplified “ultra-local” integral plant models neglecting all internal plant feedbacks. These are included and compensated by an equivalent input disturbance. The performance of the iP controller is compared with the controllers employing disturbance observers based on inverted plant model. It is shown that both these solutions may represent an alternatives to the same control strategy.","PeriodicalId":173529,"journal":{"name":"2015 20th International Conference on Process Control (PC)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 20th International Conference on Process Control (PC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PC.2015.7169996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper shows analogies between two separately evolved areas of PID control, the disturbance observer based controllers and the “intelligent” PID controllers. The simplest “intelligent” PID controller is represented by the “intelligent P” controller denoted as iP. It is designed for the simplified “ultra-local” integral plant models neglecting all internal plant feedbacks. These are included and compensated by an equivalent input disturbance. The performance of the iP controller is compared with the controllers employing disturbance observers based on inverted plant model. It is shown that both these solutions may represent an alternatives to the same control strategy.
智能P控制器与基于干扰观测器的PI控制器比较
本文展示了PID控制的两个独立发展领域,基于扰动观测器的控制器和“智能”PID控制器之间的类比。最简单的“智能”PID控制器用“智能P”控制器表示,表示为iP。它是针对忽略所有植物内部反馈的简化的“超局部”积分植物模型而设计的。这些都是由一个等效的输入扰动包含和补偿的。将iP控制器与基于倒植物模型的扰动观测器控制器的性能进行了比较。结果表明,这两种解决方案可以代表同一控制策略的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信