FMTVDM*-BEST©℗ (B.E.S.T.©℗) Breast Cancer Imaging Test (BBCIT©℗): An Enhanced Quantitative Method for Performing Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI)

Fleming Rm, T. Chaudhuri, W. Dooley, A. McKusick
{"title":"FMTVDM*-BEST©℗ (B.E.S.T.©℗) Breast Cancer Imaging Test (BBCIT©℗): An Enhanced Quantitative Method for Performing Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI)","authors":"Fleming Rm, T. Chaudhuri, W. Dooley, A. McKusick","doi":"10.33597/ABI.1001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Molecular breast imaging (MBI) uses nuclear isotopes to “qualitatively” look at the delivery and uptake by breast tissue. Clinicians then make interpretations based upon these images. Such qualitative image interpretation has limited the applicability of MBI. MBI “quantitative” imaging using enhancement of regional blood flow differences (RBFDs) augmenting isotope delivery and uptake differentiating these RBFDs and metabolic differences [Breast Enhanced Scintigraphy Test (B.E.S.T.) Imaging] has been shown to enhance diagnostic measurement of cancer and pre-cancerous tissue. Methods: In an effort to develop a “quantitative” method to differentiate breast calcium, normal breast tissue, and inflammatory changes of the breast, pre-cancers and breast cancer, this study set out to answer three fundamental questions. First, what are the fundamental differences between these four tissue types? Second, is there a method, which can briefly “enhance” these differences? Finally, can these differences be accurately “quantified?” Following the development of this method [FMTVDM-BEST©℗ (B.E.S.T.©℗) Breast Cancer Imaging Test] B.E.S.T.©℗ Breast Cancer Imaging Test (BBCIT©℗) was used to image 195 people and to compare these results with mammography and tissue pathology. Results: In the first part, of this study, 10 women were compared using both MIRALUMA (currently employed MBI) and BBCIT©℗. No statistical difference was seen between MIRALUMA and BBCIT©℗ and women with “normal” breast tissue. Women with inflammatory breast changes showed a statistically significant (P < .05) increase in isotope measuring RBFDs and metabolism using BBCIT©℗. This difference was even more significant (P < .005) in women with breast cancer where there are even greater RBFDs and metabolism. In part two of the study 195 people were studied using BBCIT©℗. The results were compared with biopsy specimens. BBCIT©℗ demonstrated an exponential increase in tracer uptake as tissue transitioned from calcium deposits to normal breast tissue to inflammatory changes of the breast to precancerous tissue changes with the greatest measured activity occurring in breast cancer proper. When maximal count activity (MCA) was compared between these tissue types, there was a statistically significant (P <0.001) difference between normal breast tissue and inflammatory changes of the breast (ICB), between ICB and pre-cancerous atypia (A), and between A and cancer (CA). Conclusion: Enhanced delivery and uptake of isotope was statistically significantly increased using BBCIT©℗ compared with the currently employed MIRALUMA Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI) approach, which is a non-enhanced qualitative method. This statistically enhanced delivery and uptake of isotope, once “quantified,” (BBCIT©℗) allows for the “quantitative” differentiation of breast tissue, including earlier detection of changes in breast cancer and the ability to “quantitatively” measure if treatment of breast cancer, pre-cancers and inflammatory breast changes is or isn’t working.","PeriodicalId":247384,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Imaging","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33597/ABI.1001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Molecular breast imaging (MBI) uses nuclear isotopes to “qualitatively” look at the delivery and uptake by breast tissue. Clinicians then make interpretations based upon these images. Such qualitative image interpretation has limited the applicability of MBI. MBI “quantitative” imaging using enhancement of regional blood flow differences (RBFDs) augmenting isotope delivery and uptake differentiating these RBFDs and metabolic differences [Breast Enhanced Scintigraphy Test (B.E.S.T.) Imaging] has been shown to enhance diagnostic measurement of cancer and pre-cancerous tissue. Methods: In an effort to develop a “quantitative” method to differentiate breast calcium, normal breast tissue, and inflammatory changes of the breast, pre-cancers and breast cancer, this study set out to answer three fundamental questions. First, what are the fundamental differences between these four tissue types? Second, is there a method, which can briefly “enhance” these differences? Finally, can these differences be accurately “quantified?” Following the development of this method [FMTVDM-BEST©℗ (B.E.S.T.©℗) Breast Cancer Imaging Test] B.E.S.T.©℗ Breast Cancer Imaging Test (BBCIT©℗) was used to image 195 people and to compare these results with mammography and tissue pathology. Results: In the first part, of this study, 10 women were compared using both MIRALUMA (currently employed MBI) and BBCIT©℗. No statistical difference was seen between MIRALUMA and BBCIT©℗ and women with “normal” breast tissue. Women with inflammatory breast changes showed a statistically significant (P < .05) increase in isotope measuring RBFDs and metabolism using BBCIT©℗. This difference was even more significant (P < .005) in women with breast cancer where there are even greater RBFDs and metabolism. In part two of the study 195 people were studied using BBCIT©℗. The results were compared with biopsy specimens. BBCIT©℗ demonstrated an exponential increase in tracer uptake as tissue transitioned from calcium deposits to normal breast tissue to inflammatory changes of the breast to precancerous tissue changes with the greatest measured activity occurring in breast cancer proper. When maximal count activity (MCA) was compared between these tissue types, there was a statistically significant (P <0.001) difference between normal breast tissue and inflammatory changes of the breast (ICB), between ICB and pre-cancerous atypia (A), and between A and cancer (CA). Conclusion: Enhanced delivery and uptake of isotope was statistically significantly increased using BBCIT©℗ compared with the currently employed MIRALUMA Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI) approach, which is a non-enhanced qualitative method. This statistically enhanced delivery and uptake of isotope, once “quantified,” (BBCIT©℗) allows for the “quantitative” differentiation of breast tissue, including earlier detection of changes in breast cancer and the ability to “quantitatively” measure if treatment of breast cancer, pre-cancers and inflammatory breast changes is or isn’t working.
FMTVDM*-BEST©©©(B.E.S.T.©©)乳腺癌影像学检查(BBCIT©©):一种进行乳腺分子成像(MBI)的增强定量方法
背景:分子乳腺成像(MBI)使用核同位素“定性”地观察乳腺组织的传递和摄取。然后临床医生根据这些图像做出解释。这种定性的图像解译限制了MBI的适用性。MBI“定量”成像使用增强区域血流差异(RBFDs),增强同位素传递和摄取,区分这些RBFDs和代谢差异[乳腺增强扫描试验(B.E.S.T.)]。影像学已经被证明可以增强对癌症和癌前组织的诊断测量。方法:为了开发一种区分乳腺钙、正常乳腺组织、乳腺炎性变化、癌前病变和乳腺癌的“定量”方法,本研究着手回答三个基本问题。首先,这四种组织类型的根本区别是什么?第二,有没有一种方法,可以短暂地“增强”这些差异?最后,这些差异能被精确地“量化”吗?随着这种方法的发展[FMTVDM-BEST©©©(B.E.S.T.©©)乳腺癌影像学检查]B.E.S.T.©©©乳腺癌影像学检查(BBCIT©©)被用于对195人进行成像,并将这些结果与乳房x光检查和组织病理学进行比较。结果:在本研究的第一部分中,10名妇女使用MIRALUMA(目前使用的MBI)和BBCIT©©进行比较。MIRALUMA和BBCIT©©与乳腺组织“正常”的女性之间没有统计学差异。乳腺炎性改变的女性在同位素测量rbfd和代谢方面显示有统计学意义(P < 0.05)增高©©。这种差异在乳腺癌患者中更为显著(P < 0.005),因为乳腺癌患者的rbfd和代谢水平更高。在研究的第二部分,使用BBCIT©©对195人进行了研究。结果与活检标本进行比较。BBCIT©©证明示踪剂的摄取在组织从钙沉积到正常乳腺组织到乳腺炎症变化到癌前组织变化的过程中呈指数增长,其中在乳腺癌中测量到的活性最大。当最大计数活性(MCA)在这些组织类型之间进行比较时,正常乳腺组织与乳腺炎性改变(ICB)、ICB与癌前异型(a)、a与癌(CA)之间的差异有统计学意义(P <0.001)。结论:与目前使用的MIRALUMA分子乳腺成像(MBI)方法相比,BBCIT©©增强了同位素的传递和摄取,这是一种非增强的定性方法。一旦“量化”(BBCIT©©),这种统计上增强的同位素传递和摄取,允许乳腺组织的“定量”分化,包括早期检测乳腺癌的变化,以及“定量”测量乳腺癌、癌前病变和炎症性乳腺变化的治疗是否有效的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信